- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- Re: Raw Vs JFS
Operating System - HP-UX
1753383
Members
5805
Online
108792
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
юдл
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
юдл
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО08-22-2002 01:02 PM
тАО08-22-2002 01:02 PM
Re: Raw Vs JFS
Remember, with the raw file systems, you need oracle to backup the contents of the file systems. This add more steps and more time when trying to recover from a disaster.
If your testing shows little or no difference in performance, you would be better off going with Vxfs for the recovery improvement.
HTH
Marty
If your testing shows little or no difference in performance, you would be better off going with Vxfs for the recovery improvement.
HTH
Marty
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО08-22-2002 01:13 PM
тАО08-22-2002 01:13 PM
Re: Raw Vs JFS
Yes, that is what I mean. You might try nodatainlog vs. datainlog for the archive/redo logs filesystems but the diffrences in performance there will be slight. Delaylog should be used in both.
If it ain't broke, I can fix that.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО08-22-2002 08:17 PM
тАО08-22-2002 08:17 PM
Re: Raw Vs JFS
I am a third party reading through this.
Nive discussion. I have been asking myself the same questions. Now I have some good answers.
Now if 9i RAC (Real-Applicaiton Clusters) would use 'cooked' files...
Nive discussion. I have been asking myself the same questions. Now I have some good answers.
Now if 9i RAC (Real-Applicaiton Clusters) would use 'cooked' files...
- « Previous
-
- 1
- 2
- Next »
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2024 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP