- Community Home
- >
- Storage
- >
- Entry Storage Systems
- >
- Disk Enclosures
- >
- Arraydsp -m vs TFM description
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО08-22-2000 03:20 PM
тАО08-22-2000 03:20 PM
Arraydsp -m vs TFM description
My question is about the manual and man pages which refer to column 5 on arraydsp -m as Disk Queue, yet the 12H and 11.x generate a fifth column of SCSI Q.
Is there a difference?
Also, the values I get are between 23 and 64, far higher than the manual's suggested typical amounts of 2-4. Yet nothing else in the other values (cache util, cache queue, etc) appears out of the unusual, and arraydsp -r has nothing to suggest. I do get disk alerts on one VG/LV which happens to be the database.
Any ideas on the above two questions?
TIA!!!!
Doug
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО08-23-2000 02:01 AM
тАО08-23-2000 02:01 AM
Re: Arraydsp -m vs TFM description
I seem to get the same resulsts with the 12H (and Oracle) as you. You don't give the configuration for your 12H, but with 6 disks my SCSI Queue is regularly up around a 100, it should not be higher than around 30. This queue-load listed is the internal dual SCSI-queue and not the wide-diff. queue running to the HPUX afaik.
I have switched the Resiliency Setting to High Performance and that changed things a lot but I switched it back to normal to be on the safe side. However, even with the high queue-loads, I don't get complaints from users so I don't worry too much.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО08-23-2000 02:44 AM
тАО08-23-2000 02:44 AM
Re: Arraydsp -m vs TFM description
http://www.hp.com/essd/model12H_writews.html
http://www.enterprisestorage.hp.com/pdfs/idc_autoraid.pdf
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО08-23-2000 08:32 PM
тАО08-23-2000 08:32 PM
Re: Arraydsp -m vs TFM description
The SCSI Queue is referring to the queue for the internal disks...it is the same.
Also the users guide is incorrect and the values for this parameter should be:
Array not in use = 0
Desired range = 0-50
Performance problems = >50
and the description of this metric is:
"Indicates the average number of transactions waiting in the internal disk SCSI queues. Too many commands in the queues decrease performance."
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО04-30-2009 01:46 PM
тАО04-30-2009 01:46 PM