- Community Home
- >
- Storage
- >
- Entry Storage Systems
- >
- Disk Enclosures
- >
- Direction of Storage with HP
Disk Enclosures
1753507
Members
5240
Online
108795
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Go to solution
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-05-2002 06:47 AM
07-05-2002 06:47 AM
With the recent merger between HP and Compaq, HP came out and said that the foundation of their storage roadmap will be Storage Works but they will continue with the XP for HP centric shops. I was talking with a friend yesterday and he said that the maximum cache with the EVA line from Storage Works is 2 GB. How can HP expect to compete on the high end storage market with a substandard system such as this. Does storageworks really compare to the XP/HDS line with even basic metrics such as maximum cache, throughput etc...? Point for any feedback. Thanks.
Quin
Quin
Solved! Go to Solution.
1 REPLY 1
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-08-2002 10:27 AM
07-08-2002 10:27 AM
Solution
I think you're taking the message the wrong way... The EVA is not going to replace the XP - it can be used in a similar environment as a alternative with a modular architecure, but it is not replacing the XP product line.
The message is really "customer choice" - you will be able to get both Modular and traditional Enterprise storage from HP.
And the EVA can compete because it's modular - the modularity allows you to use as many controllers as needed to attain a particular performance level. It's not a bad scheme - just a different paradigm. It may or may not work well in your environment. Ask your Presales Solutions Architect about suitability in your shop.
Good luck!
The message is really "customer choice" - you will be able to get both Modular and traditional Enterprise storage from HP.
And the EVA can compete because it's modular - the modularity allows you to use as many controllers as needed to attain a particular performance level. It's not a bad scheme - just a different paradigm. It may or may not work well in your environment. Ask your Presales Solutions Architect about suitability in your shop.
Good luck!
No matter where you go, there you are.
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2024 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP