- Community Home
- >
- Storage
- >
- Entry Storage Systems
- >
- Disk Enclosures
- >
- Re: EVA & XP1024
Disk Enclosures
1753638
Members
5232
Online
108798
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
юдл
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
юдл
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО12-24-2007 04:30 AM
тАО12-24-2007 04:30 AM
EVA & XP1024
hi,
I have one EVA6000 and a XP1024. when i copy a 44GB file from EVA to EVA costs 7 minutes while copy from XP1024 to XP1024 will cost 17 minutes. and i read a big file 50G from EVA, it cost 10 minutes, and read a file 50G from XP1024 will spend 20 minute.
and i ask someguy who test on the XP1024&Xp12000, copy a 47GB file on XP1024 will cost 28 minutes, 18 minutes on XP1200.
So my question is: if the read a file I wonder if a single large file reading performance on EVA is Good than on XP platform and why? and If above is True, is there is any setting for the large sequential read request on XP1024?
I have one EVA6000 and a XP1024. when i copy a 44GB file from EVA to EVA costs 7 minutes while copy from XP1024 to XP1024 will cost 17 minutes. and i read a big file 50G from EVA, it cost 10 minutes, and read a file 50G from XP1024 will spend 20 minute.
and i ask someguy who test on the XP1024&Xp12000, copy a 47GB file on XP1024 will cost 28 minutes, 18 minutes on XP1200.
So my question is: if the read a file I wonder if a single large file reading performance on EVA is Good than on XP platform and why? and If above is True, is there is any setting for the large sequential read request on XP1024?
3 REPLIES 3
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО12-24-2007 01:46 PM
тАО12-24-2007 01:46 PM
Re: EVA & XP1024
Hi,
You've told us about the storage systems, but nothing about the disk configurations, or any details about the connected hosts.
There could be many different factors that could affect the performance of different disk systems...
Cheers,
Rob
You've told us about the storage systems, but nothing about the disk configurations, or any details about the connected hosts.
There could be many different factors that could affect the performance of different disk systems...
Cheers,
Rob
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО12-24-2007 10:31 PM
тАО12-24-2007 10:31 PM
Re: EVA & XP1024
EVA6000 has 36 * 300 10k disk.
XP1024 has 11 * 146GB 15K disk group. and 24GB cache.
hpux is 11.23.
we do the test on the same server which JFS is 4.1.
XP1024 has 11 * 146GB 15K disk group. and 24GB cache.
hpux is 11.23.
we do the test on the same server which JFS is 4.1.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО12-25-2007 01:26 AM
тАО12-25-2007 01:26 AM
Re: EVA & XP1024
EVA disk group has 3 times more disks than the XP1024, so it can transfer 3 times more data por second. Until you start talking about disk groups with 50 or more disks, the internal cabling or the controllers are not the limit.
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2024 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP