- Community Home
- >
- Storage
- >
- Entry Storage Systems
- >
- Disk Enclosures
- >
- Re: EVA5000 - EVA4400
Disk Enclosures
1752578
Members
5062
Online
108788
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
юдл
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
юдл
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО08-04-2009 08:35 AM
тАО08-04-2009 08:35 AM
EVA5000 - EVA4400
Hello
We Currently have an EVA5000 with our DB application on 150 fc 15k 72Gb drives.
I have been asked to evaluate the performance hit if we move the application to a EVA4400 on 38 fc 15k 300GB drives, I reckon we will only be able to perform at 25-30% of the current config.
Can anyone help me out here? We will move from 2G Fibre backbone onto 4GB.
We currently have full use of the 5000 and will need to share controlers on the 4400 with a simialr but less intensive application.
We Currently have an EVA5000 with our DB application on 150 fc 15k 72Gb drives.
I have been asked to evaluate the performance hit if we move the application to a EVA4400 on 38 fc 15k 300GB drives, I reckon we will only be able to perform at 25-30% of the current config.
Can anyone help me out here? We will move from 2G Fibre backbone onto 4GB.
We currently have full use of the 5000 and will need to share controlers on the 4400 with a simialr but less intensive application.
3 REPLIES 3
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО08-04-2009 10:11 AM
тАО08-04-2009 10:11 AM
Re: EVA5000 - EVA4400
Hi,
here are some sizing tools:
http://h71028.www7.hp.com/enterprise/cache/576785-0-0-225-121.html?jumpid=reg_R1002_USEN
here are some sizing tools:
http://h71028.www7.hp.com/enterprise/cache/576785-0-0-225-121.html?jumpid=reg_R1002_USEN
the pain is one part of the reality
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО08-05-2009 07:39 AM
тАО08-05-2009 07:39 AM
Re: EVA5000 - EVA4400
Hi Thanks for the link,
I'm having trouble running the SAN designer tool,
Is there a different tool that could do the same or even is there a simple rule of thumb in relation to the amount of disks in use?
I'm having trouble running the SAN designer tool,
Is there a different tool that could do the same or even is there a simple rule of thumb in relation to the amount of disks in use?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО08-06-2009 03:37 AM
тАО08-06-2009 03:37 AM
Re: EVA5000 - EVA4400
just a comment on the setup, you don't say how many enclosures but for best setup you want 40 disks in the group not 38 as the EVA breaks down the DGs into sets of 8 disks (called RSSs), also you should get better than 25% of the 5k performance as the controllers are more powerful and have a larger cache to serve the 4Gb backend.
_________________________________________________
How to assign points on this new forum? Click the Kudos Star!
How to assign points on this new forum? Click the Kudos Star!
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2024 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP