- Community Home
- >
- Storage
- >
- Entry Storage Systems
- >
- Disk Enclosures
- >
- HP Surestore Virtual Array 7100
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО07-16-2001 01:36 AM
тАО07-16-2001 01:36 AM
HP Surestore Virtual Array 7100
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО07-16-2001 08:25 AM
тАО07-16-2001 08:25 AM
Re: HP Surestore Virtual Array 7100
Any array will show low transfer rates with small blocksizes. 10MB/s sounds like a very high number if you're doing 512 byte I/Os - it would translate to 20,000 I/O's per second. That's way fast! Assuming that you're using something more reasonable, like 4K blocks, you're still around 2,500 I/Os per second. Also very good.
Try a larger blocksize. 64K should get you closer to the 90MB/s. Multiple streams should really get you there.
There are industry standard benchmarks out there that you can use to test bandwidth (your 90MB/s) and IOPS (which should be up to 12,000 IOPS.)
Search for iozone and bonnie on the net for example benchmarks that run on windows. There are many more free ones out there.
Have fun
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО07-17-2001 01:46 AM
тАО07-17-2001 01:46 AM
Re: HP Surestore Virtual Array 7100
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО07-17-2001 04:46 AM
тАО07-17-2001 04:46 AM
Re: HP Surestore Virtual Array 7100
If you're just using windows explorer to copy a file and watching the transfer rates, that won't perform well. The copy facility waits for each I/O to complete before sending the next one - meaning that it will defeat the cache on the array. You will see much better results using a real benchmark, such as IOZONE or BONNIE.
I will be setting up an Win2K box (an LT 6000) with 2 VA7100's today. I will reproduce your environment if you post more specific information on how you have it set up, and let you know what I see for transfer rates.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО07-17-2001 06:11 AM
тАО07-17-2001 06:11 AM
Re: HP Surestore Virtual Array 7100
Currently I have the virtual Array configured as follows:
15 x 18GB (15k) disks.
2 x 512MB controllers linked to two HP HBA's
2 LUNS configured each 40GB in size.
Active hot spare configured.
The capacity of the array looks as follows:
Logical - 80GB
Unallocated - 41.73GB
Redundancy - 95.23GB
Active Spare - 33.38
Total - 250.34
HP Autopath is installed and configured to use default load balancing.
The LUNS seen by Windows are configured as basic disks with 2 primary partitions of 20GB on each giving me E,F,G and H drives.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО07-20-2001 05:22 AM
тАО07-20-2001 05:22 AM
Re: HP Surestore Virtual Array 7100
I'm also not using AutoPath, which may be required to get the 90MB/s.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО07-20-2001 07:17 AM
тАО07-20-2001 07:17 AM
Re: HP Surestore Virtual Array 7100
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО07-20-2001 01:53 PM
тАО07-20-2001 01:53 PM
Re: HP Surestore Virtual Array 7100
Iometer was set for sequential read, 64K blocks. I forget how many threads we used - it was the default. I don't remember if iozone does this or not - I haven't run either one in 2 years or so.
I would expect that if we install AutoPath so we can load balance between the controllers, we'll see the 90MB/s.
As for striping, well, with a VA7100 I don't think it would improve performance. Use the AutoPath for that.
If you're going to install a database on the VA, you shouldn't be concerned with sequential performance. It's the IOPS that you should be really worried about. Both iozone and iometer can generate small block random reads and writes as a test, and see how many I/O's that thing can do.
Good luck
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО07-20-2001 01:56 PM
тАО07-20-2001 01:56 PM
Re: HP Surestore Virtual Array 7100
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО07-25-2001 12:16 AM
тАО07-25-2001 12:16 AM