- Community Home
- >
- Storage
- >
- Entry Storage Systems
- >
- Disk Enclosures
- >
- Re: HP va 7100 lun and oracle
Disk Enclosures
1753486
Members
4222
Online
108794
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
юдл
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
юдл
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Go to solution
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО04-09-2002 12:25 AM
тАО04-09-2002 12:25 AM
what is the better configuration for use vith an oracle data base : one big lun, or multiple small luns ???
Thanks
Thanks
Solved! Go to Solution.
3 REPLIES 3
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО04-09-2002 01:12 AM
тАО04-09-2002 01:12 AM
Solution
I would recommend at least for HPUX systems that any databases would benefit greatly from having smaller LUNS. How big is the disk array that you may wish to split up? I have a few different disk arrays, but it would depend on the combination of servers or platforms that your going to run on them. If I was running databases only 10Gb LUNS are a good flexible size to choose. They are large enough to use in volume groups for DB's and not too large to waste space.
Anyone for a Mutiny ?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО04-09-2002 08:39 AM
тАО04-09-2002 08:39 AM
Re: HP va 7100 lun and oracle
Here's a little background on why you would want more LUNs for a database...
In a word - queue depth.
The queue depth is the number of outstanding I/O's that can be queued to a disk or LUN. All disks or LUNs have a maximum.
So, if your max queue depth to a LUN is say, 32, then having 10 LUNs would give you a max of 320 I/Os queued to the database drives... this adds performance.
On the VA7100, the queue depth is 256, and it is *shared* by *all* the LUNs. So, if you have one LUN, the max queue depth is 256. If you have 10 LUNs the max queue depth is (approx) 25 per LUN, or 256 total... but it's just slightly more complicated that that... the 256 is dynamically shared between the LUNs, so that you can have 10 LUNs, but if you're doing I/O to only one of them, you can still use the 256 on that one LUN.
In a word, the queue depth on the VA7100 is for the whole box, not by individual LUNs.
So, to directly answer your question - it makes no difference how many LUNs you use. Use however many is convienient for you (for example, one for logs, one for indices, and one for dataspaces.).
Good luck!
In a word - queue depth.
The queue depth is the number of outstanding I/O's that can be queued to a disk or LUN. All disks or LUNs have a maximum.
So, if your max queue depth to a LUN is say, 32, then having 10 LUNs would give you a max of 320 I/Os queued to the database drives... this adds performance.
On the VA7100, the queue depth is 256, and it is *shared* by *all* the LUNs. So, if you have one LUN, the max queue depth is 256. If you have 10 LUNs the max queue depth is (approx) 25 per LUN, or 256 total... but it's just slightly more complicated that that... the 256 is dynamically shared between the LUNs, so that you can have 10 LUNs, but if you're doing I/O to only one of them, you can still use the 256 on that one LUN.
In a word, the queue depth on the VA7100 is for the whole box, not by individual LUNs.
So, to directly answer your question - it makes no difference how many LUNs you use. Use however many is convienient for you (for example, one for logs, one for indices, and one for dataspaces.).
Good luck!
No matter where you go, there you are.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО04-11-2002 06:12 AM
тАО04-11-2002 06:12 AM
Re: HP va 7100 lun and oracle
Don??t know if you have dual fiberchannel paths to the VA?
If you have it??s very important that you will config lvm so the primary link will go thru controller 1 on the VA. If pri link is set thru controller 2 you will have a performance loss inside the VA. This could be fairly big.
This is because all luns belongs to redundancy group 1=controller 1
How to check this:
do armdsp -i, then armdsp -a
check loop id on controller 1. Now do ioscan -fn, check devicefilename for your luns seen by controller 1.
If your lun1 on controller 1 is /dev/dsk/c1t0d1
and the same lun1 thru controller 2 is /dev/dsk/c2t0d1, then put c1t0d1 as your primary link.
It could be wise to ask HP for help on this.
FYI This handled differently on the VA7400.
You might also want to modify kernal buffer cache setting depending how your application works.
If you have it??s very important that you will config lvm so the primary link will go thru controller 1 on the VA. If pri link is set thru controller 2 you will have a performance loss inside the VA. This could be fairly big.
This is because all luns belongs to redundancy group 1=controller 1
How to check this:
do armdsp -i, then armdsp -a
check loop id on controller 1. Now do ioscan -fn, check devicefilename for your luns seen by controller 1.
If your lun1 on controller 1 is /dev/dsk/c1t0d1
and the same lun1 thru controller 2 is /dev/dsk/c2t0d1, then put c1t0d1 as your primary link.
It could be wise to ask HP for help on this.
FYI This handled differently on the VA7400.
You might also want to modify kernal buffer cache setting depending how your application works.
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2024 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP