- Community Home
- >
- Storage
- >
- Entry Storage Systems
- >
- Disk Enclosures
- >
- Re: LVM Striping of LUSE's?
Disk Enclosures
1753529
Members
5083
Online
108795
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
юдл
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
юдл
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-04-2005 07:44 AM
тАО01-04-2005 07:44 AM
LVM Striping of LUSE's?
Would I see a benefit if I did LVM striping across LUSE's?
I just created 10 OPEN-E*3 LUSE's (Made up of expanded dispersed OPEN-E's spread across 3 parity groups), and thought I might get better performance if I stripe them at the LVM.
XP512
Any input conserning question is welcome.
Thanks,
Dan
I just created 10 OPEN-E*3 LUSE's (Made up of expanded dispersed OPEN-E's spread across 3 parity groups), and thought I might get better performance if I stripe them at the LVM.
XP512
Any input conserning question is welcome.
Thanks,
Dan
2 REPLIES 2
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-04-2005 09:49 PM
тАО01-04-2005 09:49 PM
Re: LVM Striping of LUSE's?
You will generally see better performance in HPUX with LVM striping, as the OS "sees" more than one device, and can queue I/Os to the individual devices.
For example, if you have one device and no striping, you can queue only 8 (If I remember correctly) I/Os at a time to that device; however, if you stripe over 10 devices, you can queue 80 I/Os (8 per device).
The effect of this is significantly better performance and higher throughput on heavily loaded systems. (lighter I/O loads don't really take advantage of the queueing - you have to fill the queues!)
Now, you have to consider the geometry of what you've created. Think of a senario where you have 10 LUNs on the same array group (or drive, if it helps to think of it that way) - if you stripe them, it means that I'Os will be evenly spread over the LUNs, which means that they'll be evenly spread over the "drive".
This would be bad.
Why? Head movement. By doing such, you would be seeking the heads on the drive for every I/O... long seeks. That's slow.
So, you would most likely be better off making one LUSE on each array group (ie: no disperse), and stripe those 3 LUNs with LVM.
One last thing - LUSE on the XP512 is not the most efficient thing - your HPUX host usually has more CPU power available for such operations, so unless it's really heavily loaded, you will generally get better performance using regular LUNs and having the host stripe them.
I hope this helps. Good luck,
Vince
For example, if you have one device and no striping, you can queue only 8 (If I remember correctly) I/Os at a time to that device; however, if you stripe over 10 devices, you can queue 80 I/Os (8 per device).
The effect of this is significantly better performance and higher throughput on heavily loaded systems. (lighter I/O loads don't really take advantage of the queueing - you have to fill the queues!)
Now, you have to consider the geometry of what you've created. Think of a senario where you have 10 LUNs on the same array group (or drive, if it helps to think of it that way) - if you stripe them, it means that I'Os will be evenly spread over the LUNs, which means that they'll be evenly spread over the "drive".
This would be bad.
Why? Head movement. By doing such, you would be seeking the heads on the drive for every I/O... long seeks. That's slow.
So, you would most likely be better off making one LUSE on each array group (ie: no disperse), and stripe those 3 LUNs with LVM.
One last thing - LUSE on the XP512 is not the most efficient thing - your HPUX host usually has more CPU power available for such operations, so unless it's really heavily loaded, you will generally get better performance using regular LUNs and having the host stripe them.
I hope this helps. Good luck,
Vince
No matter where you go, there you are.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-05-2005 12:19 AM
тАО01-05-2005 12:19 AM
Re: LVM Striping of LUSE's?
Thanks for your help!
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2024 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP