- Community Home
- >
- Storage
- >
- Entry Storage Systems
- >
- Disk Enclosures
- >
- Nike disk array Cache size
Disk Enclosures
1753451
Members
5610
Online
108794
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
юдл
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
юдл
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-12-2002 08:04 PM
тАО03-12-2002 08:04 PM
Nike disk array Cache size
I am trying to determine if it is justify increasing the cache size of the Nike disk array from 10M to 64M.
My HPUX OS buffer cache is 600M in size and is averaging 100% for %rcache or GPL_MEM_CACHE_HIT_PCT, also 97% %wcache. It looks like Nike cache is redundancy if the OS buffer cache is large enough like the box that I have. Given in theory most of the data in the Nick cache should be in the buffer cache anyway and most of the buffer cache miss would generate a Nick cache miss therefore a physical disk access? That sound having a large Nick cache pointless. Am not saying it is totally unnecessary assuming the storage processor has its own algorithm to do certain read ahead and keep the data in the Nike cache. Beside of that, would there be a significant performance gain to upgrade the cache in the Nike from 10M to 64M?
Thanks for your help,
Keith Leung
My HPUX OS buffer cache is 600M in size and is averaging 100% for %rcache or GPL_MEM_CACHE_HIT_PCT, also 97% %wcache. It looks like Nike cache is redundancy if the OS buffer cache is large enough like the box that I have. Given in theory most of the data in the Nick cache should be in the buffer cache anyway and most of the buffer cache miss would generate a Nick cache miss therefore a physical disk access? That sound having a large Nick cache pointless. Am not saying it is totally unnecessary assuming the storage processor has its own algorithm to do certain read ahead and keep the data in the Nike cache. Beside of that, would there be a significant performance gain to upgrade the cache in the Nike from 10M to 64M?
Thanks for your help,
Keith Leung
2 REPLIES 2
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-12-2002 08:17 PM
тАО03-12-2002 08:17 PM
Re: Nike disk array Cache size
Hi,
I haven't got the piece of hardware, but there
has been many posts recently in regards to the
usage of the kernel buffer cache. General
consensus is that having any more than 300Mb is
a pointless exercise. This could be what is
causing your current problem. Do a search on
buffer cache in the forums here and you will see what I am talking about. Below are some:
http://forums.itrc.hp.com/cm/QuestionAnswer/1,,0xf49203bbece8d5118ff40090279cd0f9,00.html
http://forums.itrc.hp.com/cm/QuestionAnswer/1,11866,0x997cabe92dabd5118ff10090279cd0f9,00.html
I haven't got the piece of hardware, but there
has been many posts recently in regards to the
usage of the kernel buffer cache. General
consensus is that having any more than 300Mb is
a pointless exercise. This could be what is
causing your current problem. Do a search on
buffer cache in the forums here and you will see what I am talking about. Below are some:
http://forums.itrc.hp.com/cm/QuestionAnswer/1,,0xf49203bbece8d5118ff40090279cd0f9,00.html
http://forums.itrc.hp.com/cm/QuestionAnswer/1,11866,0x997cabe92dabd5118ff10090279cd0f9,00.html
Anyone for a Mutiny ?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-13-2002 12:55 AM
тАО03-13-2002 12:55 AM
Re: Nike disk array Cache size
depends on your raid level.
If you're in R5, I'd suggest assigning more memory for the calculation space around 2M per LUN.
You can turn on statistics on the nike via gridmgr, but I'd prefer to rely on host based tests and turn ALL stats off on the Nike. (Bet you have them on)
Most perf gain on the Nike will come from elsewhere. (bet you've messed up that config)
See my posts here:
http://forums.itrc.hp.com/cm/QuestionAnswer/1,,0xd5178ffa98a2d5118ff10090279cd0f9,00.html
Later,
Bill
If you're in R5, I'd suggest assigning more memory for the calculation space around 2M per LUN.
You can turn on statistics on the nike via gridmgr, but I'd prefer to rely on host based tests and turn ALL stats off on the Nike. (Bet you have them on)
Most perf gain on the Nike will come from elsewhere. (bet you've messed up that config)
See my posts here:
http://forums.itrc.hp.com/cm/QuestionAnswer/1,,0xd5178ffa98a2d5118ff10090279cd0f9,00.html
Later,
Bill
It works for me (tm)
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2024 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP