- Community Home
- >
- Storage
- >
- Entry Storage Systems
- >
- Disk Enclosures
- >
- RAID on LC2000
Disk Enclosures
1752785
Members
6102
Online
108789
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
юдл
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
юдл
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-06-2002 07:55 AM
тАО09-06-2002 07:55 AM
RAID on LC2000
I have an LC2000 with 4 18GB drives which is currently set up without RAID, but I am going to convert to RAID 10 using a NetRaid 1si controller. All my drives were suppose to be identical, but looking at the output from a hardware inspection program I noticed the last drive is slightly different:
0: HP 18.2GB A 80-SA40SA40 (18.20 GB)
1: HP 18.2GB A 80-SA40SA40 (18.20 GB)
2: HP 18.2GB A 80-SA40SA40 (18.20 GB)
3: HP 18.2GB C 80-BX02BX02 (18.21 GB)
So the fourth actually has 18.21GB space as opposed to 18.20. Is this going to prevent me from having all these drives on the same RAOD 10 array?
0: HP 18.2GB A 80-SA40SA40 (18.20 GB)
1: HP 18.2GB A 80-SA40SA40 (18.20 GB)
2: HP 18.2GB A 80-SA40SA40 (18.20 GB)
3: HP 18.2GB C 80-BX02BX02 (18.21 GB)
So the fourth actually has 18.21GB space as opposed to 18.20. Is this going to prevent me from having all these drives on the same RAOD 10 array?
3 REPLIES 3
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-09-2002 12:19 AM
тАО09-09-2002 12:19 AM
Re: RAID on LC2000
Hi Tim,
When you build a Raid array the total space used is always equal to the size of the smallest of your discs i.e. the 18.2gb. However this is the unformatted size and you will find that you only end up with about 16.9gb on each disc for data. You are not losing very much by having them initialize themselves at the 18.2 size.
hth
Malvin
When you build a Raid array the total space used is always equal to the size of the smallest of your discs i.e. the 18.2gb. However this is the unformatted size and you will find that you only end up with about 16.9gb on each disc for data. You are not losing very much by having them initialize themselves at the 18.2 size.
hth
Malvin
Not me Chief, I'm Radar
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-11-2002 05:47 AM
тАО09-11-2002 05:47 AM
Re: RAID on LC2000
Hi Tim,
Malvin is correct the lowest common denominator is always taken on first initialization. THat means you can make u a raid like that without a problem. If you have a defective drive in the future which needs to be exchanged and it has a size below 18.20GB it might be refused as "too low capacity". The lower amount of data Malvin is hinting on is a problem of calculation between OS and the Hardware Marketing Departments. Mainly that is because the difference in seeing 1GB as 1000mb to 1GB as 1024MB (what causes the rest of the capacity loss: I do not know). Nobody wants to calculate with 1024 if calculation with 1000 is easier ;-)
But justfor you to be aware of beside your question: you should urgently update the firmware of your Drives. All SA40 drives should be updated to a revision SA4c and the BX02 Drive should be updated to BX05.
It is very important as especially the SA40 firmware can cause the drive to fail in the Raid, which can be cleared through a rebuild for the moment, but it is not necessary to run into that problem by upgrading the firmware.
Regards.
Sven
Malvin is correct the lowest common denominator is always taken on first initialization. THat means you can make u a raid like that without a problem. If you have a defective drive in the future which needs to be exchanged and it has a size below 18.20GB it might be refused as "too low capacity". The lower amount of data Malvin is hinting on is a problem of calculation between OS and the Hardware Marketing Departments. Mainly that is because the difference in seeing 1GB as 1000mb to 1GB as 1024MB (what causes the rest of the capacity loss: I do not know). Nobody wants to calculate with 1024 if calculation with 1000 is easier ;-)
But justfor you to be aware of beside your question: you should urgently update the firmware of your Drives. All SA40 drives should be updated to a revision SA4c and the BX02 Drive should be updated to BX05.
It is very important as especially the SA40 firmware can cause the drive to fail in the Raid, which can be cleared through a rebuild for the moment, but it is not necessary to run into that problem by upgrading the firmware.
Regards.
Sven
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-11-2002 10:20 AM
тАО09-11-2002 10:20 AM
Re: RAID on LC2000
Thanks, I think I've downloaded all the necessary utilities/firmware for the upgrade. At first I didn't even realize these were different drive mfg since they all had the same part number.
Here are the files I've gotten for the upgrade:
HP NetServer Firmware Tool
4.Q.11 13-Dec-01
------
HP Hard Disk Drive Firmware Tool Catalog File for the AMI/Adaptec Controller
4.1e 2-Jan-02
------
Firmware SA4C for D5039A and D7174A 18GB drives made by IBM (to be used with the Firmware Upgrade Tool)
nphnsa4c-bs6 22-May-00
------
Firmware BX05 for Seagate 9.10GB / 18.2GB 7200rpm Ultra 3. - 09043133.lod
BX05 17-Jul-02
Here are the files I've gotten for the upgrade:
HP NetServer Firmware Tool
4.Q.11 13-Dec-01
------
HP Hard Disk Drive Firmware Tool Catalog File for the AMI/Adaptec Controller
4.1e 2-Jan-02
------
Firmware SA4C for D5039A and D7174A 18GB drives made by IBM (to be used with the Firmware Upgrade Tool)
nphnsa4c-bs6 22-May-00
------
Firmware BX05 for Seagate 9.10GB / 18.2GB 7200rpm Ultra 3. - 09043133.lod
BX05 17-Jul-02
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2024 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP