- Community Home
- >
- Storage
- >
- Entry Storage Systems
- >
- Disk Enclosures
- >
- Re: RAID solution needed for HP-UX and INGRES Data...
Disk Enclosures
1752734
Members
5614
Online
108789
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
юдл
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
юдл
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО07-16-2000 06:53 PM
тАО07-16-2000 06:53 PM
RAID solution needed for HP-UX and INGRES Database
I need a fault tolerance solution for our HP-UX 10.20 and Ingres 6.4 environment. I was steered toward the AutoRAID. However, I have had conflicting reports. We are currently running 10.20 on a K420. This will shortly be updated to 11 and an L series running Ingres II.
These are the options I can see.
* XP256
* FC60
* AutoRAID 12H
* MirrorDisk with a disk enclosure
The budget or corporate needs to not extend to the XP and FC60 range.
Are there other solutions for this environment?
Any help is most appreciated
These are the options I can see.
* XP256
* FC60
* AutoRAID 12H
* MirrorDisk with a disk enclosure
The budget or corporate needs to not extend to the XP and FC60 range.
Are there other solutions for this environment?
Any help is most appreciated
- Tags:
- RAID
3 REPLIES 3
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО07-17-2000 07:43 AM
тАО07-17-2000 07:43 AM
Re: RAID solution needed for HP-UX and INGRES Database
I don't know anything about Ingres nor do I know how large your databases are.
We use a 12H for our Oracle environment and it is performing well (both internally and externally for Internet-access by our customers).
Remember that a 12H contains a maximum of 12 HDD's and that for optimum performance this means with 12 18Gb HDD's you will get 158Gb capacity with Hotspare on en and 174 GB with Hotspare off. This might not be enough and that would mean more 12H's.
Maarten van Maanen
Netherlands
We use a 12H for our Oracle environment and it is performing well (both internally and externally for Internet-access by our customers).
Remember that a 12H contains a maximum of 12 HDD's and that for optimum performance this means with 12 18Gb HDD's you will get 158Gb capacity with Hotspare on en and 174 GB with Hotspare off. This might not be enough and that would mean more 12H's.
Maarten van Maanen
Netherlands
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО07-17-2000 10:35 AM
тАО07-17-2000 10:35 AM
Re: RAID solution needed for HP-UX and INGRES Database
In terms of the options that become available for deversification, the XP256 is clearly superior. But this could be overkill too. I'm confused about what your trying to say with, "The budget or corporate needs to not extend to the XP and FC60 range." By comparison the Autoraid is not cheap. In my mind, the autoraid is best for situations when SA's don't have any idea how the data is being utilized and/or won't have the opportunity to properly allocate data to the appropraite raid configuration. But I wonder how well this unit exports from one platform to another. The others are usually not much more than switching connectivity and performing the appropriate vgexport and vgimport sequences with very little fanfare. But this statement is only valid for non-root volume groups.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО07-18-2000 12:56 PM
тАО07-18-2000 12:56 PM
Re: RAID solution needed for HP-UX and INGRES Database
As Tim said, the XP may be overkill. I have one and really like it. It's a lot of box for a small database though.
EMC has a smaller entry level unit. It too will be expensive. However if you compare it to buying an XP that you will never fill out, it is a better deal.
I also have AutoRaids and FC30 (Nike) arrays. They simply can not compare to an XP or EMC.
EMC always plays hard ball on pricing. They will move if they know you are considering an XP.
EMC has a smaller entry level unit. It too will be expensive. However if you compare it to buying an XP that you will never fill out, it is a better deal.
I also have AutoRaids and FC30 (Nike) arrays. They simply can not compare to an XP or EMC.
EMC always plays hard ball on pricing. They will move if they know you are considering an XP.
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2024 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP