- Community Home
- >
- Storage
- >
- Entry Storage Systems
- >
- Disk Enclosures
- >
- Smart Array 5304 Peformance considerations
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-23-2006 06:16 AM
тАО01-23-2006 06:16 AM
Smart Array 5304 Peformance considerations
I have a Raid 5 with 10 hard drives in a 4300 enclosure attached to a Smart Array 5304 with 128MB of cache.
Here's my question: Will I see a performance increase of the logical drive if I arrange the drives in two different 4300s, each attached to a different port on the controller?
Thanks in advance,
J├╢rg-Stefan
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-24-2006 02:56 AM
тАО01-24-2006 02:56 AM
Re: Smart Array 5304 Peformance considerations
Performance is all relative.
Usage, application, etc. Adding a cahe module is the most dramatic basic performance increase, giving some breathing room for writing the RAID.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-27-2006 07:29 AM
тАО01-27-2006 07:29 AM
Re: Smart Array 5304 Peformance considerations
Before, a single threaded Disk I/O tool showed a 45MB/sec write rate and a 72MB/sec read rate; after moving half of the drives to a second enclosure attached to port 3 the read rate increased to 85MB/sec, write performance did not show any change.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-27-2006 02:23 PM
тАО01-27-2006 02:23 PM
Re: Smart Array 5304 Peformance considerations
Thats sounds about right. You should expect to see a read performance since you are now utilizing more of the card's buses instead of taxing a single bus.
As for Writing, I would expect that you would see a bigger difference on a more intensive test, but simple writes would probably not show much change.
Can you perform another test assuming you have the time, this time try copying or moving a large amount of data. If you did this already in the initial test, then just disregard.
Steven
HP Master ASE, Storage, Servers, and Clustering
MCSE (NT 4.0, W2K, W2K3)
VCP (ESX2, Vi3, vSphere4, vSphere5, vSphere 6.x)
RHCE
NPP3 (Nutanix Platform Professional)
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-28-2006 12:10 AM
тАО01-28-2006 12:10 AM
Re: Smart Array 5304 Peformance considerations
What do you consider a larg file? I did my initial tests with 500MB files...
I personaly would have expected that the 33Mhz slot in which the 5304 is located is a bottleneck, it's obviously wrong, I would say.
What do you think, will I see an additional performance increase if I move the controller to a machine with a 66Mhz PCI slot?
What concerns me a bit: During disk I/O the system time shown by Windows Task manager (W2K3+SP1) significantly increases, about 25% on a four way system. Firmware and drivers are up to date... Is this a normal, expected behaviour?
Is there any documentation from HP which covers this disk I/O performance topic in more detail?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО02-09-2006 03:49 AM
тАО02-09-2006 03:49 AM
Re: Smart Array 5304 Peformance considerations
I don't want to disagree with any of the previous replies. However if you plan on spanning a single logical drive/array onto two different SA4300 controllers you will likely not be able to access your storage.
This is because you are unable to span an array to mulitple controllers, you can only span channels. With the SA5304 all four ports are on the same controller.
Just wanted to give you a warning before you attempt this process.
(Sorry if someone already covered this. I didn't look too thoroughly at the previous posts.)
Jake Zeeman
HP Server Storage
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО02-09-2006 05:03 AM
тАО02-09-2006 05:03 AM
Re: Smart Array 5304 Peformance considerations
But many thanks for your attention!