- Community Home
- >
- Storage
- >
- Entry Storage Systems
- >
- Disk Enclosures
- >
- Storageworks MA8000 copy
Disk Enclosures
1753947
Members
7545
Online
108811
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-19-2003 12:39 PM
02-19-2003 12:39 PM
Storageworks MA8000 copy
Hi
I have 2 copies of a 1 TB Oracle DB running on a S/Works MA8000.Once a month the one has to be "refreshed" from the other.The LUN and VG layout for the 2 are identical.Would it be possible to perform the copy on the array without involving the O/S (HPUX 11.00) ?
Thanx
I have 2 copies of a 1 TB Oracle DB running on a S/Works MA8000.Once a month the one has to be "refreshed" from the other.The LUN and VG layout for the 2 are identical.Would it be possible to perform the copy on the array without involving the O/S (HPUX 11.00) ?
Thanx
1 REPLY 1
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-19-2003 12:46 PM
02-19-2003 12:46 PM
Re: Storageworks MA8000 copy
There are several factors that are probably affecting your copy speed...
First off, cp is not a speedy copy mechanism. It tends to use smaller blocksizes. If you can use dd, you can increase the blocksize to something more optimal, such as 64k. (use the bs=64k argument)
You can also run several dd's at the same time to get concurrency.
Secondly, the number of drives you're writing to is a significant factor. 2 drives are faster than one. 10 are faster than 5... 20 are faster than 10. If there's any way you can increase the number of drives, it would be helpful.
The third thing I can think of is to use some sort of snapshot technology; some of the newer arrays (notably the EVA) contain snapshot and snapclone technology. Snapclone sounds like it would fit your needs well - it will take a point-in-time space-efficient copy of the data, then (in the background) copy the data to the backup drives. Your problems with your copy window completely go away! It would be "done" in seconds, as far as your server is concerned.
Good luck, I hope this helps.
Vince
First off, cp is not a speedy copy mechanism. It tends to use smaller blocksizes. If you can use dd, you can increase the blocksize to something more optimal, such as 64k. (use the bs=64k argument)
You can also run several dd's at the same time to get concurrency.
Secondly, the number of drives you're writing to is a significant factor. 2 drives are faster than one. 10 are faster than 5... 20 are faster than 10. If there's any way you can increase the number of drives, it would be helpful.
The third thing I can think of is to use some sort of snapshot technology; some of the newer arrays (notably the EVA) contain snapshot and snapclone technology. Snapclone sounds like it would fit your needs well - it will take a point-in-time space-efficient copy of the data, then (in the background) copy the data to the backup drives. Your problems with your copy window completely go away! It would be "done" in seconds, as far as your server is concerned.
Good luck, I hope this helps.
Vince
No matter where you go, there you are.
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2024 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP