- Community Home
- >
- Storage
- >
- Entry Storage Systems
- >
- Disk Enclosures
- >
- performance differences M20 & M30
Disk Enclosures
1752806
Members
6049
Online
108789
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-27-2001 01:15 AM
07-27-2001 01:15 AM
performance differences M20 & M30
we have two K class servers and wish to clone one for DR
the main server has an M30 FC array conencted but the DR server has M20 SCSI array, both have snmae amount of disk space available
what is the difference in performance between the M20 and M30 if both systems were set up the same apart from this item of hardware
the company really doesnt want to spend money on another M30 and all the FC connections if it can be helped
tahnsk
Paul Gold
CAST systems
the main server has an M30 FC array conencted but the DR server has M20 SCSI array, both have snmae amount of disk space available
what is the difference in performance between the M20 and M30 if both systems were set up the same apart from this item of hardware
the company really doesnt want to spend money on another M30 and all the FC connections if it can be helped
tahnsk
Paul Gold
CAST systems
1 REPLY 1
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-30-2001 01:51 AM
07-30-2001 01:51 AM
Re: performance differences M20 & M30
Model 30 (GALAXY)
Host interface
- Full-Speed Fibre Channel Arbitrated Loop
- 100 MB/s (1 GB/s)
- Short-Wave Optical Fibre Duplex SC - Connector
Drive bus
- 8-bit SCSI-2 10 MB/s (single ended); 5 buses
Storage controller
- Up to 64 MB of read/write cache per controller (minimum configuration is 5 disk modules, 1 storage controller, and 1 battery backup unit)
*** High-performance, 7200-rpm, 4.1 GB, 8.8 GB, and 17.8 GB disk modules
*** Dual active storage controllers afford dual 100 MB/s (1 GB/s) FC-AL links to single or multiple hosts
*** Up to 128 MB user-allocated read/write cache optimizes RAID performance
*** Hardware RAID implementation optimizes performance and minimizes host system overhead
Model 20 (NIKE)
Host Interface
- 16-bit SCSI-220 MB/s (Wide and Differential)
Drive Bus
- 8-bit SCSI-210 MB/s (single-ended); 2 buses
Storage Controller
- Up to 64 MB of read/write cache (minimum configuration is 5 disk drives, 2 storage controllers, and 1 battery backup unit)
Array Storage Capacity
- Up to 20 drives with up to 84 GB (with 4.2 GB disks
*** Dual-active storage controllers afford dual Fast/Wide SCSI links to a single host1 or multiple hosts
*** High performance, 7200 RPM, 4.2 GB, 8.8 GB and 17.8 GB disk modules provide high speed access.
*** Up to 64 MB user-allocated read/write cache (16 MB for Model 10) optimize the RAID 5 write performance
*** Adaptive caching algorithms on the storage processor dynamically tune the caching parameters optimizing array performance to I/O patterns that may vary over time
*** Hardware RAID implementation optimizes performance and minimizes host system overhead
Hope this helps,
Host interface
- Full-Speed Fibre Channel Arbitrated Loop
- 100 MB/s (1 GB/s)
- Short-Wave Optical Fibre Duplex SC - Connector
Drive bus
- 8-bit SCSI-2 10 MB/s (single ended); 5 buses
Storage controller
- Up to 64 MB of read/write cache per controller (minimum configuration is 5 disk modules, 1 storage controller, and 1 battery backup unit)
*** High-performance, 7200-rpm, 4.1 GB, 8.8 GB, and 17.8 GB disk modules
*** Dual active storage controllers afford dual 100 MB/s (1 GB/s) FC-AL links to single or multiple hosts
*** Up to 128 MB user-allocated read/write cache optimizes RAID performance
*** Hardware RAID implementation optimizes performance and minimizes host system overhead
Model 20 (NIKE)
Host Interface
- 16-bit SCSI-220 MB/s (Wide and Differential)
Drive Bus
- 8-bit SCSI-210 MB/s (single-ended); 2 buses
Storage Controller
- Up to 64 MB of read/write cache (minimum configuration is 5 disk drives, 2 storage controllers, and 1 battery backup unit)
Array Storage Capacity
- Up to 20 drives with up to 84 GB (with 4.2 GB disks
*** Dual-active storage controllers afford dual Fast/Wide SCSI links to a single host1 or multiple hosts
*** High performance, 7200 RPM, 4.2 GB, 8.8 GB and 17.8 GB disk modules provide high speed access.
*** Up to 64 MB user-allocated read/write cache (16 MB for Model 10) optimize the RAID 5 write performance
*** Adaptive caching algorithms on the storage processor dynamically tune the caching parameters optimizing array performance to I/O patterns that may vary over time
*** Hardware RAID implementation optimizes performance and minimizes host system overhead
Hope this helps,
Never say "no" first.
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2024 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP