- Community Home
- >
- Storage
- >
- Entry Storage Systems
- >
- Disk Enclosures
- >
- synchronous CA performance (XP-512)
Disk Enclosures
1753777
Members
7333
Online
108799
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Go to solution
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-12-2003 03:24 AM
02-12-2003 03:24 AM
Can I affect performance of a CA-link by using the -c option of the paircreate command over a synchronous CA-link (both ends XP-512)?
If so, is it wise to do so in a live large DB environment (4500 users/6TB database)
If so, is it wise to do so in a live large DB environment (4500 users/6TB database)
Solved! Go to Solution.
1 REPLY 1
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-12-2003 06:00 AM
02-12-2003 06:00 AM
Solution
You cannot affect the performance of the link. What the Copy Pace parameter does is define the number of tracks that can be modified before Host writes are blocked. Basically, it defines how far behind your copy is. With Synchronous, it defines how many write I/Os you can have in-flight at any given time for the pair.
The XP will always use as much of the remote link as it can... as long as Host write activity is less than your pipe has bandwidth, you should be good.
Setting the Copy Pace higher will allow bursts of data to the volume to be accepted (up to 15 I/Os) without degrading performance. Lowering this value will degrade Host performance (not copy performance) if your bursts exceed the value you set.
Is it wise to tweak this value? Probably not.
Good luck,
Vince
The XP will always use as much of the remote link as it can... as long as Host write activity is less than your pipe has bandwidth, you should be good.
Setting the Copy Pace higher will allow bursts of data to the volume to be accepted (up to 15 I/Os) without degrading performance. Lowering this value will degrade Host performance (not copy performance) if your bursts exceed the value you set.
Is it wise to tweak this value? Probably not.
Good luck,
Vince
No matter where you go, there you are.
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2024 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP