- Community Home
- >
- Storage
- >
- Entry Storage Systems
- >
- Disk Enclosures
- >
- Re: 12H array setup for performance
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО11-04-2002 11:48 AM
тАО11-04-2002 11:48 AM
12H array setup for performance
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО11-04-2002 12:07 PM
тАО11-04-2002 12:07 PM
Re: 12H array setup for performance
Ted
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО11-04-2002 12:13 PM
тАО11-04-2002 12:13 PM
Re: 12H array setup for performance
Good Luck.
Steve
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО11-04-2002 12:15 PM
тАО11-04-2002 12:15 PM
Re: 12H array setup for performance
There are a MAXIMUM of 8 LUNS numbered 0-7.
If using a "hotspare", your overhead will be equivalent to that of the largest disk. If all of your disks are 18GB, your overhead will be 18GB for the hotspare alone.
AutoRAID will use RAID 0+1 until you exceed 50% utilization. At that time, an algorithm will determine what data should be placed into RAID 5. The remaining data will remain in RAID 0+1. The significance is that as you begin to utilize more space in LUNS, more data is forced into RAID 5. As this occurs, performance will suffer.
The bigger problem is how much "free" space you have that is NOT allocated to LUNS. This allows the AutoRAID to perform at it's optimal level.
Maximum performance is also obtained if you have two HBA's (Host Bus Adapters) connected to this device. By utilizing both controllers simultaneously, you can drastically improve performance.
I would suggest you take some time to read over the manuals provided here:
http://www.hp.com/cposupport/manindex/hpsurestor19162_eng_man.html
Hope this helps,
Dave
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО11-04-2002 01:50 PM
тАО11-04-2002 01:50 PM
Re: 12H array setup for performance
There is absolutely no advantage to more than 2 LUN's per volume group. If this is a UNIX setup then each
LUN which comprises the VG should be equal in size. LUNA should be configured so that the primary path is using controller X (alternate Y) and LUNB should utilize Controller Y as primary (alternate X). You then stripe each LVOL across both LUN's in 64k chunks.
Also, as has been indicated, try to limit the total size of all allocated LUN's to about 50% capacity so that the array stays in RAID 1/0 at all times.
If you increase the number of LUN's there will APPEAR to be less disk utilization but overall throughput will not be improved. All that performance tools like Glance know it that an awful lot of I/O is going through what it thinks is 1 disk. Performance tools have no way to know that this is an array.