- Community Home
- >
- Storage
- >
- Entry Storage Systems
- >
- Disk Enclosures
- >
- Re: 300GB Disks 4 x slower than 72GB disks
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО05-07-2009 04:31 AM
тАО05-07-2009 04:31 AM
Share and Enjoy! Ian
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО05-07-2009 05:42 AM
тАО05-07-2009 05:42 AM
SolutionAnother thing is if they are talking about 1 TB made with 72 GB disks versus 1 TB made with 300 GB disks. 4 times more disks give you 4 times more speed, obviously.
Check http://h20000.www2.hp.com/bizsupport/TechSupport/Document.jsp?objectID=c01671044
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО05-07-2009 06:08 AM
тАО05-07-2009 06:08 AM
Re: 300GB Disks 4 x slower than 72GB disks
Is there any benefit in converting to RAID1 for a supposed performance increase? Also, would anyone know the max IO/sec for each EVA 5000 HSV110 Controller?
Share and Enjoy! Ian
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО05-07-2009 06:31 AM
тАО05-07-2009 06:31 AM
Re: 300GB Disks 4 x slower than 72GB disks
The quickspecs only say "up to":
Sustained I/O and MB Throughput Up to 141K IOPS and up to 700MB/s throughput per Controller Pair
http://h18000.www1.hp.com/products/quickspecs/11006_div/11006_div.html
IMHO larger drives are usually a bit slower, but 4 times? How did you measure this?
Hope this helps!
Regards
Torsten.
__________________________________________________
There are only 10 types of people in the world -
those who understand binary, and those who don't.
__________________________________________________
No support by private messages. Please ask the forum!
If you feel this was helpful please click the KUDOS! thumb below!
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО05-07-2009 06:35 AM
тАО05-07-2009 06:35 AM
Re: 300GB Disks 4 x slower than 72GB disks
I imagine the block size is 4 x as large as well, which might work the EVA cache a little more but should provide roughly the same IOPS and data throughput.
Share and Enjoy! Ian
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО05-07-2009 06:48 AM
тАО05-07-2009 06:48 AM
Re: 300GB Disks 4 x slower than 72GB disks
... now compare a 18GB and a 1TB drive ...
;-))
Hope this helps!
Regards
Torsten.
__________________________________________________
There are only 10 types of people in the world -
those who understand binary, and those who don't.
__________________________________________________
No support by private messages. Please ask the forum!
If you feel this was helpful please click the KUDOS! thumb below!
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО05-07-2009 07:12 AM
тАО05-07-2009 07:12 AM
Re: 300GB Disks 4 x slower than 72GB disks
When calculating I/Os per second the only things that matter is the type of drive and it's rpm. This is because the limit for random I/Os is the seek time of the drive heads (compare a mechanical disk to a SSD).
The sequential transfer rates increase with size since the amount of data that passes under the head in each revolution is bigger.
The limits of the EVA controllers are irrelevant, since you'll only reach that with a fully loaded EVA and in some non-real life cases. The limit are always the disks.
Yes, vdisks in RAID 1 are faster than in RAID 5, but take more space obviously.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО05-07-2009 09:41 AM
тАО05-07-2009 09:41 AM
Re: 300GB Disks 4 x slower than 72GB disks
- sorry, could not resist.
The differences are in the number of platters, seek speed - in the old days some drives had multiple heads per surface to reduce seek distance, bit density and geometry. But if you get blank looks...
The sales man inside me would ignore all this technobabble and happily sell many EVAs with many small disk drives ;-)
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО05-08-2009 12:07 AM
тАО05-08-2009 12:07 AM
Re: 300GB Disks 4 x slower than 72GB disks
From a pure spindle speed side, the drives are almost identical. But the 300GB Disks contains 4 times more vdisks which creates an illusion that the 300GB disks are much slower
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО05-08-2009 08:15 AM
тАО05-08-2009 08:15 AM
Re: 300GB Disks 4 x slower than 72GB disks
Do you currently have both size disks in your EVA ? Are the disks in different groups, with different quantities of disks in each ?
The performance of a disk group is dependant on the number of disks within it, so if you have say a group with 32 x 72GB disks and a group with 8 x 300GB disks, you'd getter better performance from the former. Would it be 4x faster ? Doubtful...
Cheers,
Rob