- Community Home
- >
- Storage
- >
- Entry Storage Systems
- >
- Disk Enclosures
- >
- Re: Continuous Access between EVA5000 (VCS 3.028) ...
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО07-15-2008 01:27 AM
тАО07-15-2008 01:27 AM
Continuous Access between EVA5000 (VCS 3.028) and EVA4400
our customer plan to migrate his EVA5000 with firmware (VCS 3.028) to a EVA4400.
My question is, can our customer use Continuous Access to migrate the data from the old EVA5000 to the EVA4400 (step by step) without doing a firmware upgrade on the EVA5000?
Kind regards
Andre
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО07-15-2008 01:44 AM
тАО07-15-2008 01:44 AM
Re: Continuous Access between EVA5000 (VCS 3.028) and EVA4400
the compatibility can be checked here:
http://bizsupport.austin.hp.com/bc/docs/support/SupportManual/c01494607/c01494607.pdf
and here is the CA EVA implementation guide
http://bizsupport.austin.hp.com/bc/docs/support/SupportManual/c01489857/c01489857.pdf
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО07-15-2008 06:25 AM
тАО07-15-2008 06:25 AM
Re: Continuous Access between EVA5000 (VCS 3.028) and EVA4400
Continuous Access between EVA5000 and EVA4400 isn't support.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО07-15-2008 10:22 AM
тАО07-15-2008 10:22 AM
Re: Continuous Access between EVA5000 (VCS 3.028) and EVA4400
I am afraid not, according to the Quickspecs at:
http://h18000.www1.hp.com/products/quickspecs/11617_div/11617_div.html
- Unidirectional data migration from EVA 3000/5000 to EVA 4400 is supported using CA features
- EVA 4400 to EVA 3000/5000 replication will NOT be supported
- EVA3000/5000 firmware versions VCS 3.1xx & 4.1xx are required
- Only Synchronous mode replication supported
- Link is FC only (the expectation is the customer will be replacing a EVA3000/5000 with an EVA 4400 within the data center)
...and some more.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО07-15-2008 10:57 AM
тАО07-15-2008 10:57 AM
Re: Continuous Access between EVA5000 (VCS 3.028) and EVA4400
EVA5000 3.028 can be upgraded to the 3.110 online without the downtime
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-11-2008 11:24 PM
тАО09-11-2008 11:24 PM
Re: Continuous Access between EVA5000 (VCS 3.028) and EVA4400
I decided to do some testing and setup a new vdisk on 4400 and then replicated this with CA to the 3000 which worked without a hitch. I suspect the unsupported part of the replication from 3k to 4400 is that HP will not support its functionality??
Anyone have any Ideas?