- Community Home
- >
- Storage
- >
- Entry Storage Systems
- >
- Disk Enclosures
- >
- Re: EMC / HP arrays
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-12-2005 07:01 PM
тАО03-12-2005 07:01 PM
We are planning to implement Oracle ERP solutions and Oracle CRM for which the space requirement would be around 8TB. We have our billing systems currently connected to EVA SAN.
a) I would like to know if we should extend our existing EVA SAN or should we migrate to XP arrays for better performance, redundancy and scalability.
b)I have heard that EMC disk arrays are better than HP and people also say that EMC is the market leader in disk arrays. For HP storage is not the main bussiness so you cannot be sure about the road map of HP arrays.
e) How would you compare EVA vs Clarion and
XP vs Symmetrix
Regards,
Franklin.
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-12-2005 07:21 PM
тАО03-12-2005 07:21 PM
SolutionI haven't worked with EVA's so I can't really say much there. The Clariions are okay. They work fairly well once set up, but getting to that point can be tricky sometimes.
We have always had great luck with Symmetrix frames (38*, 88*, DMX). They can be pricy though. As for the XP, don't forget that they are actually Hitachi arrays (rebranded). We had an older XP256 and XP512 and both worked quite well for us.
I would say your best bet is to see what features you need and then price them out.
David
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-13-2005 04:06 AM
тАО03-13-2005 04:06 AM
Re: EMC / HP arrays
For the Symmetrix/XP - I've never seen any trouble worth noting with our EMC^2's but the XP ought to be faster.
Also, while it is true that this is not HP's main terretory the XPs are relabeled Hitachi systems so You wouldn't face problems if HPs roadmap changed.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-13-2005 05:08 AM
тАО03-13-2005 05:08 AM
Re: EMC / HP arrays
I've had multple EMCs (DA or fronted by Brocade). Expensive, but worked great. The price has dropped a lot over time. The most difficult part about buying EMC has always been the sales/marketing/billing aspect of things. The break/fix guys are usually great. At the time I last looked (several years ago), the XP family did not seem sufficiently developed for our needs (sorry, I wish I could remember the reasons -- I think it had to do with redundancy of certain elements and also with software).
I don't know that much about EVA (and you don't say which model), but I would think XP would be better. BUT -- what do you need (not what do you want :-)?
My experience with high-end EMC has been better than my experience with low-end HP. Apples and oranges, though.
HTH,
Mic
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-13-2005 07:44 AM
тАО03-13-2005 07:44 AM
Re: EMC / HP arrays
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-13-2005 04:03 PM
тАО03-13-2005 04:03 PM
Re: EMC / HP arrays
Yes we did save money, but I have a lot more grey hairs. I miss the Symmetrix.
Our HP support technicians have urged us to go to an XP - and I believe they are truly looking out for us. I cannot speak for the XPs though, as I have not worked with them. We evaluated an XP-12000 and were all set to go with it but we're adding more EVA 5000s instead (money determination) - so more grey hairs on their way.
Hope this helps a little.
B
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-13-2005 08:49 PM
тАО03-13-2005 08:49 PM
Re: EMC / HP arrays
Having said that you will find EMC are very agressive in the modular SAN arena today.
You will find no cost justification in deploying strings of XP/ Symmetrix, and to be fair, they will overperform any app you are looking to put on it. They really are for the SAP landscapes out their and such like.
Good luck,