- Community Home
- >
- Storage
- >
- Entry Storage Systems
- >
- Disk Enclosures
- >
- LUSE or RAID 0
Disk Enclosures
1748256
Members
4131
Online
108760
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
юдл
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
юдл
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Go to solution
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО10-06-2003 12:09 PM
тАО10-06-2003 12:09 PM
We added a single 146 GB array group to our XP48 and plan to direct attach a couple of windows 2003 hosts. Using RAID5 + OPEN-9 i am getting 7gb per lun and wanted some suggestions on how to provide this space to the windows hosts.
1. should i luse multiple luns to give a 100gb drive to the windows host OR should i use software raid0 to stripe mutiple luns to get a decent size drive for windows.
2. from a overall performace perspective, what is better? Software raid for grouping multiple luns on the windows server or luse on the xp48.
3. is autopath xp a requirement for redundant fiber channel cards for load balancing on Windows 2003 hosts?
Thanks
Mandar
1. should i luse multiple luns to give a 100gb drive to the windows host OR should i use software raid0 to stripe mutiple luns to get a decent size drive for windows.
2. from a overall performace perspective, what is better? Software raid for grouping multiple luns on the windows server or luse on the xp48.
3. is autopath xp a requirement for redundant fiber channel cards for load balancing on Windows 2003 hosts?
Thanks
Mandar
Solved! Go to Solution.
2 REPLIES 2
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО10-07-2003 09:33 PM
тАО10-07-2003 09:33 PM
Solution
Hi,
From overall Performance perspective Luse LUNS are better than software raid 0 as software raid consumes the resource of your Host system which is limited than XP48.
If you want to Load Balance across redundant fiber channel then AutoPath XP is a must.
From overall Performance perspective Luse LUNS are better than software raid 0 as software raid consumes the resource of your Host system which is limited than XP48.
If you want to Load Balance across redundant fiber channel then AutoPath XP is a must.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО10-08-2003 02:19 AM
тАО10-08-2003 02:19 AM
Re: LUSE or RAID 0
HP's XP line are actually Hitachi frames with some HP customizations (mostly software). Yes LUSE luns (either RAID0 or RAID5) are way much faster than your server's RAID management. On the real Hitachi frames, I can multi-path LUNs so that a LUN appears on more than one HBA.. from your server -- you can then use whatever pathing software there is... If AutoPath is not your choice, then you may tale a close look at Veritas Volume Manager where DMP is there for your load balancing and path failover.
HTH.
HTH.
Hakuna Matata.
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2024 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP