- Community Home
- >
- Storage
- >
- Entry Storage Systems
- >
- Disk Enclosures
- >
- Limitations with Command View EVA 3.3 - issues in ...
Disk Enclosures
1753774
Members
7041
Online
108799
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-16-2004 03:15 AM
11-16-2004 03:15 AM
Limitations with Command View EVA 3.3 - issues in the field, req. clarification
As we know, CV EVA 3.3 supports the installation on a Management Appliance or on a semi-dedicated Windows server.
There are some restrictions identified in the release notes that are causing some delivery issues in the field in a traditional management appliance environment, these are:
1) Release Notes for CV EVA 3.3 state that "SSSU Build 7 for Command View 3.3" is required. The latest platform kit for the EVA 3000 is 3.0F, and it contains an older version of SSSU “Build 7 for Command View 3.2”. Where is the proper SSSU kit? Is there a platform kit for Windows version 3.0G perhaps? Either the release notes are incorrect or there is an unpublished platform kit that is required.
2) Release Notes state that as of CV 3.3, SecurePath Manager is not supported on a Management Appliance. We have customers with SecurePath Manager properly working on an existing Management Appliance. Upgrading to CV 3.3/VCS 3.020 still allows SecurePath Manager to function. Business Copy server and SecurePath Manager are both essential tools that should be installed on the Management Appliance. Could the release notes be incorrect, and perhaps the statement was referring to CV 3.3 installed on a separate Windows server and not the Management Appliance? Obviously the management appliance si the best location for centralized path management.
There are some restrictions identified in the release notes that are causing some delivery issues in the field in a traditional management appliance environment, these are:
1) Release Notes for CV EVA 3.3 state that "SSSU Build 7 for Command View 3.3" is required. The latest platform kit for the EVA 3000 is 3.0F, and it contains an older version of SSSU “Build 7 for Command View 3.2”. Where is the proper SSSU kit? Is there a platform kit for Windows version 3.0G perhaps? Either the release notes are incorrect or there is an unpublished platform kit that is required.
2) Release Notes state that as of CV 3.3, SecurePath Manager is not supported on a Management Appliance. We have customers with SecurePath Manager properly working on an existing Management Appliance. Upgrading to CV 3.3/VCS 3.020 still allows SecurePath Manager to function. Business Copy server and SecurePath Manager are both essential tools that should be installed on the Management Appliance. Could the release notes be incorrect, and perhaps the statement was referring to CV 3.3 installed on a separate Windows server and not the Management Appliance? Obviously the management appliance si the best location for centralized path management.
"tried and true instead of new and improved"
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2024 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP