- Community Home
- >
- Storage
- >
- Entry Storage Systems
- >
- Disk Enclosures
- >
- Possible slow I/O throughput on newly created unit...
Disk Enclosures
1752337
Members
5613
Online
108787
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-25-2006 07:41 PM
07-25-2006 07:41 PM
Possible slow I/O throughput on newly created unit.
Hi All a few days ago, I created a new striped unit and 1 jbod, I then used addvol to create 1 advfs file domain. (Not my preferred method, but then I am not paying the bill ;-)..
Feeling rather pleased with myself I think job done.... but no The Backup engineer informs me that his backups to that file domain which is underpinned by my unit is taking double the time :-(
Not saving any kind paper output has not helped, but is there anything that I would need to set that might, as I am still not sure if it is anything I have done, but might speed us the time taken to preform a backup..
I enclose my units
D15 DBBACKUP
LUN ID: 6000-1FE1-001C-1AF0-0009-8090-0678-002A
NOIDENTIFIER
Switches:
RUN NOWRITE_PROTECT READ_CACHE
READAHEAD_CACHE WRITEBACK_CACHE
MAX_READ_CACHED_TRANSFER_SIZE = 32
MAX_WRITE_CACHED_TRANSFER_SIZE = 32
Access:
ALL
State:
ONLINE to this controller
Persistent reserved
NOPREFERRED_PATH
Host Based Logging NOT Specified
Size: 711146265 blocks
Geometry (C/H/S): ( 1394405 / 2 / 255 )
D14 DISK30000
LUN ID: 6000-1FE1-001C-1AF0-0009-8090-0678-001F
NOIDENTIFIER
Switches:
RUN NOWRITE_PROTECT READ_CACHE
READAHEAD_CACHE WRITEBACK_CACHE
MAX_READ_CACHED_TRANSFER_SIZE = 32
MAX_WRITE_CACHED_TRANSFER_SIZE = 32
Access:
ALL
State:
ONLINE to this controller
Persistent reserved
NOPREFERRED_PATH
Host Based Logging NOT Specified
Size: 35556389 blocks
Geometry (C/H/S): ( 7000 / 20 / 254 )
Feeling rather pleased with myself I think job done.... but no The Backup engineer informs me that his backups to that file domain which is underpinned by my unit is taking double the time :-(
Not saving any kind paper output has not helped, but is there anything that I would need to set that might, as I am still not sure if it is anything I have done, but might speed us the time taken to preform a backup..
I enclose my units
D15 DBBACKUP
LUN ID: 6000-1FE1-001C-1AF0-0009-8090-0678-002A
NOIDENTIFIER
Switches:
RUN NOWRITE_PROTECT READ_CACHE
READAHEAD_CACHE WRITEBACK_CACHE
MAX_READ_CACHED_TRANSFER_SIZE = 32
MAX_WRITE_CACHED_TRANSFER_SIZE = 32
Access:
ALL
State:
ONLINE to this controller
Persistent reserved
NOPREFERRED_PATH
Host Based Logging NOT Specified
Size: 711146265 blocks
Geometry (C/H/S): ( 1394405 / 2 / 255 )
D14 DISK30000
LUN ID: 6000-1FE1-001C-1AF0-0009-8090-0678-001F
NOIDENTIFIER
Switches:
RUN NOWRITE_PROTECT READ_CACHE
READAHEAD_CACHE WRITEBACK_CACHE
MAX_READ_CACHED_TRANSFER_SIZE = 32
MAX_WRITE_CACHED_TRANSFER_SIZE = 32
Access:
ALL
State:
ONLINE to this controller
Persistent reserved
NOPREFERRED_PATH
Host Based Logging NOT Specified
Size: 35556389 blocks
Geometry (C/H/S): ( 7000 / 20 / 254 )
1 REPLY 1
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-26-2006 03:29 AM
07-26-2006 03:29 AM
Re: Possible slow I/O throughput on newly created unit.
Double the time as compared to what?
You'll need to post the output of
SHOW DISK FULL
SHOW UNITS FULL
SHOW STRIPE
SHOW RAID
SHOW MIRROR
from your HSG80-based storage array as well as info on how your AdvFS domains are configured to get any meaningful answers. Is LSM involved?
You'll need to post the output of
SHOW DISK FULL
SHOW UNITS FULL
SHOW STRIPE
SHOW RAID
SHOW MIRROR
from your HSG80-based storage array as well as info on how your AdvFS domains are configured to get any meaningful answers. Is LSM involved?
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2024 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP