Skip to ContentSkip to Footer
Start of content
- Community Home
- >
- Storage
- >
- Entry Storage Systems
- >
- Disk Enclosures
- >
- Re: Question Regarding DISK LUNS in ESX
Disk Enclosures
-
-
Forums
- Products
- Servers and Operating Systems
- Storage
- Software
- Services
- HPE GreenLake
- Company
- Events
- Webinars
- Partner Solutions and Certifications
- Local Language
- China - 简体中文
- Japan - 日本語
- Korea - 한국어
- Taiwan - 繁體中文
-
- Advancing Life & Work
- Advantage EX
- Alliances
- Around the Storage Block
- HPE Ezmeral: Uncut
- OEM Solutions
- Servers & Systems: The Right Compute
- Tech Insights
- The Cloud Experience Everywhere
- HPE Blog, Austria, Germany & Switzerland
- Blog HPE, France
- HPE Blog, Italy
- HPE Blog, Japan
- HPE Blog, Middle East
- HPE Blog, Latin America
- HPE Blog, Russia
- HPE Blog, Saudi Arabia
- HPE Blog, South Africa
- HPE Blog, UK & Ireland
- HPE Blog, Poland
-
Blogs
- Advancing Life & Work
- Advantage EX
- Alliances
- Around the Storage Block
- HPE Blog, Latin America
- HPE Blog, Middle East
- HPE Blog, Saudi Arabia
- HPE Blog, South Africa
- HPE Blog, UK & Ireland
- HPE Ezmeral: Uncut
- OEM Solutions
- Servers & Systems: The Right Compute
- Tech Insights
- The Cloud Experience Everywhere
-
Information
- Community
- Welcome
- Getting Started
- FAQ
- Ranking Overview
- Rules of Participation
- Tips and Tricks
- Resources
- Announcements
- Email us
- Feedback
- Information Libraries
- Integrated Systems
- Networking
- Servers
- Storage
- Other HPE Sites
- Support Center
- Aruba Airheads Community
- Enterprise.nxt
- HPE Dev Community
- Cloud28+ Community
- Marketplace
-
Forums
-
Forums
-
Blogs
-
Information
-
English
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-15-2011 12:53 AM
02-15-2011 12:53 AM
Question Regarding DISK LUNS in ESX
HI All,
I have a question regarding LUNS in ESX using EVA shared Storage.
A while Ago I saw a video blog on evas with ESX and the techy was saying about creating a lun per vm...instead of one big lun for many VM's
Now I have been using this in esx 3.5 u2 and esx 4 and esx 4.1i and has worked really well.
I then had a discussion with a co worker Who uses traditional type san (assigning physical disk to a san LUN etc.
Rather than like the eva assigning all the disk to a disk group.
We had a great discussion about merits etc.
But I would like some feedback about this from the hp Community.
The only downside I see is yes you have to manage more luns...but I dont think it adds much time based on how easy it is to create luns in an eva.
Are there techy reasons why this is not good.?
I think disk space is better utilised as I only allocate disk needed when we create a VM and only what is required.
Not big luns up front that may not get filled or completely used over time.
I am interested in thoughts and technical reasons both from a san and esx view point.
Cheers
Steve
I have a question regarding LUNS in ESX using EVA shared Storage.
A while Ago I saw a video blog on evas with ESX and the techy was saying about creating a lun per vm...instead of one big lun for many VM's
Now I have been using this in esx 3.5 u2 and esx 4 and esx 4.1i and has worked really well.
I then had a discussion with a co worker Who uses traditional type san (assigning physical disk to a san LUN etc.
Rather than like the eva assigning all the disk to a disk group.
We had a great discussion about merits etc.
But I would like some feedback about this from the hp Community.
The only downside I see is yes you have to manage more luns...but I dont think it adds much time based on how easy it is to create luns in an eva.
Are there techy reasons why this is not good.?
I think disk space is better utilised as I only allocate disk needed when we create a VM and only what is required.
Not big luns up front that may not get filled or completely used over time.
I am interested in thoughts and technical reasons both from a san and esx view point.
Cheers
Steve
3 REPLIES 3
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-15-2011 04:32 AM
02-15-2011 04:32 AM
Re: Question Regarding DISK LUNS in ESX
A few documents about best practices to optimize performance:
http://h20195.www2.hp.com/V2/GetPDF.aspx/4AA1-2185ENW.pdf
http://www.vmware.com/pdf/Perf_Best_Practices_vSphere4.0.pdf
http://www.vmware.com/files/pdf/scalable_storage_performance.pdf
http://h20195.www2.hp.com/V2/GetPDF.aspx/4AA1-2185ENW.pdf
http://www.vmware.com/pdf/Perf_Best_Practices_vSphere4.0.pdf
http://www.vmware.com/files/pdf/scalable_storage_performance.pdf
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-15-2011 02:36 PM
02-15-2011 02:36 PM
Re: Question Regarding DISK LUNS in ESX
Hi,
One big lun gives you a lot of flexibility.
One LUN per VM gives you management overhead and no benefit in my opinion.
One big lun gives you a lot of flexibility.
One LUN per VM gives you management overhead and no benefit in my opinion.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-15-2011 02:42 PM
02-15-2011 02:42 PM
Re: Question Regarding DISK LUNS in ESX
Hi Joshua,
Certainly agree that Yes you have to create more luns...but this takes less than 10 Seconds.(this was argued by co worker).
I would agree on an emc San this is a burden.
My counter arguement is that the one big lun means space upfront....and you have to manage what vm's go on in so as work loads match, scsi reservation issues etc...so the management overhead is Higher in my oppion on those one big luns over the life of that lun as you do have to be careful what VM you put on them with other vm's (so sharing that lun does not cause issues).
You dont get issues with is in the one vm per lun.
Cheers
Steve
Certainly agree that Yes you have to create more luns...but this takes less than 10 Seconds.(this was argued by co worker).
I would agree on an emc San this is a burden.
My counter arguement is that the one big lun means space upfront....and you have to manage what vm's go on in so as work loads match, scsi reservation issues etc...so the management overhead is Higher in my oppion on those one big luns over the life of that lun as you do have to be careful what VM you put on them with other vm's (so sharing that lun does not cause issues).
You dont get issues with is in the one vm per lun.
Cheers
Steve
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
End of content
United States
Hewlett Packard Enterprise International
Communities
- Communities
- HPE Blogs and Forum
© Copyright 2022 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP