- Community Home
- >
- Storage
- >
- Entry Storage Systems
- >
- Disk Enclosures
- >
- Raid 5 vs Raid 0+1
-
- Forums
-
Blogs
- Alliances
- Around the Storage Block
- Behind the scenes @ Labs
- HPE Careers
- HPE Storage Tech Insiders
- Infrastructure Insights
- Inspiring Progress
- Internet of Things (IoT)
- My Learning Certification
- OEM Solutions
- Servers: The Right Compute
- Shifting to Software-Defined
- Telecom IQ
- Transforming IT
- Infrastructure Solutions German
- L’Avenir de l’IT
- IT e Trasformazione Digitale
- Enterprise Topics
- ИТ для нового стиля бизнеса
- Blogs
-
Quick Links
- Community
- Getting Started
- FAQ
- Ranking Overview
- Rules of Participation
- Contact
- Email us
- Tell us what you think
- Information Libraries
- Integrated Systems
- Networking
- Servers
- Storage
- Other HPE Sites
- Support Center
- Enterprise.nxt
- Marketplace
- Aruba Airheads Community
-
Forums
-
Blogs
-
InformationEnglish
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-07-2006 06:31 AM
08-07-2006 06:31 AM
I would like to design the system disks for data warhouse and I don't know which type of RAID to chose Raid 5 or Raid 0+1.
Which should you suggest and why?
Thanks
Taulant
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-07-2006 07:51 AM
08-07-2006 07:51 AM
SolutionWith no doubt, if what you are looking for is to preserve your data, to have good warranty that you can recover data without lost ( 95% time ).
I Definetly recommend you to go hardware raid 5.
With it if you lost one drive you can recover, you can configure hot spares, so there is more security for your data.
Raid 5 is never a good reason not to backup data as accidents happen all the time.
Raid 0+1 is a good solution for a small bussiness and cheaper than Raid 5.
Regards,
Jaime.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-07-2006 01:38 PM
08-07-2006 01:38 PM
Re: Raid 5 vs Raid 0+1
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-07-2006 06:14 PM
08-07-2006 06:14 PM
Re: Raid 5 vs Raid 0+1
I use 0+1 which it's good for us as we have a small number of servers and not that critical. Raid 5 provides more security I believe.
Also have u considered RAID ADG? This is what i have copied from somewhere :
"RAID ADG allows two drives to fail simultaneously without downtime or
data loss."
"RAID ADG is an extension of RAID 5 that allows additional fault tolerance by using two different and independent parity schemes. Data is striped across a set of hard drives, just as with RAID 5, and the two sets of parity data are calculated and written across all the drives in the array.
RAID ADG provides an extremely high level of fault tolerance and can sustain two simultaneous drive failures without downtime or data loss. This fault tolerance level is the perfect solution when data is mission critical"
Hope this helps..
kyris
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-07-2006 10:20 PM
08-07-2006 10:20 PM
Re: Raid 5 vs Raid 0+1
RAID 5 has better data protection and good for reads. If you are using SAN it is better to spread accross multiple spindles to get maximum spindles.
RAID 0 + 1 has less data protection and good for writes.
Regards
Sathish
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-08-2006 12:35 AM
08-08-2006 12:35 AM
Re: Raid 5 vs Raid 0+1
Hewlett Packard Enterprise International
- Communities
- HPE Blogs and Forum
© Copyright 2019 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP