- Community Home
- >
- Storage
- >
- Entry Storage Systems
- >
- Disk Enclosures
- >
- Re: VA7100 -> EVA4000
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО11-06-2005 11:08 PM
тАО11-06-2005 11:08 PM
we are planning to replace our VA7100. It seems to me so far that the EVA4000 would be most suitable.
If you assume that both arrays have the same disk speeds and sizes, same raid level, same host, what is the performance gain to expect?
In terms of MB/sec read and write. SAN connection speed will probably not be the limiting factor?
I can't find any information on this in the Quickspecs or data sheet.
Any information or test results would be greatly appreciated.
regards,
M. Kurz
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО11-06-2005 11:14 PM
тАО11-06-2005 11:14 PM
Re: VA7100 -> EVA4000
Works fine.
I think you find an answer for your questions on
http://h18006.www1.hp.com/products/storageworks/eva4000/index.html
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО11-07-2005 03:06 AM
тАО11-07-2005 03:06 AM
Re: VA7100 -> EVA4000
The EVA has more powerful CPUs, and doesn't have AutoRAID, so there's a little less for the controllers to do.
This translates into higher throughput and lower latency in general.
How much of a difference you will see will vary greatly depending on your configuration and access patterns. Your Hosts' performance is also a factor - is it powerful enough to drive the EVA harder than the VA?
For example, if you have 10 or fewer drives, you probably won't see a very remarkable difference in performance between the VA and EVA because both would be drive-constrained.
As you add more drives, however, you will see an increasing performance difference, particularly with RAID5 in the EVA vs RAID5-DP (aka RAID6) in the VA.
I hope this helps,
Vince
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО11-07-2005 03:26 PM
тАО11-07-2005 03:26 PM
Re: VA7100 -> EVA4000
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО11-07-2005 04:21 PM
тАО11-07-2005 04:21 PM
Re: VA7100 -> EVA4000
pls check this thread to know diff abt VA and EVA,
http://forums1.itrc.hp.com/service/forums/questionanswer.do?threadId=972020
u can visit hp site to know more abt EVA4000
Awadhesh
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО11-07-2005 06:56 PM
тАО11-07-2005 06:56 PM
Re: VA7100 -> EVA4000
Aren't there any test results available?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО11-07-2005 11:34 PM
тАО11-07-2005 11:34 PM
Re: VA7100 -> EVA4000
That's the point - you can't expect any particular % of performance difference.
If you can give us a configuration for the VA and the EVA, we could make an educated guess, but that's about all it would be - a guess.
Regards,
Vince
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО11-08-2005 12:23 AM
тАО11-08-2005 12:23 AM
SolutionVA:
512MB of cache
10K or 15K 100MB/sec Drives
100MB/Sec total bandwidth
Maximum of 15 Drives
EVA:
3072MB of cache
15K 400MB/sec Drives
800MB/Sec total Bandwidth
Maximum of 56 Drives.
The EVA will give a performance boost of 30 - 200% depending on what your usage is.
Josh
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО11-08-2005 02:06 AM
тАО11-08-2005 02:06 AM
Re: VA7100 -> EVA4000
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО11-08-2005 02:13 AM
тАО11-08-2005 02:13 AM