- Community Home
- >
- Storage
- >
- Entry Storage Systems
- >
- Disk Enclosures
- >
- VG7100 Active Spare
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО02-27-2004 07:55 AM
тАО02-27-2004 07:55 AM
VG7100 Active Spare
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО02-27-2004 05:16 PM
тАО02-27-2004 05:16 PM
Re: VG7100 Active Spare
It is rare that 2 drives go down at once, If you really want to have more redundancy, then you may go for 2DP.
Thx
NH
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО02-27-2004 11:44 PM
тАО02-27-2004 11:44 PM
Re: VG7100 Active Spare
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО02-29-2004 05:21 AM
тАО02-29-2004 05:21 AM
Re: VG7100 Active Spare
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО02-29-2004 09:29 PM
тАО02-29-2004 09:29 PM
Re: VG7100 Active Spare
The VA will have 1 disk hotspare per RG when the number of disks in a RG are 15 or less. As soon as you add the 16th disk it will use 2, this is what happens when hotspare is set to auto, you can also select 1 or 2 disks manually if you like.
Regards,
Arend
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО02-29-2004 09:31 PM
тАО02-29-2004 09:31 PM
Re: VG7100 Active Spare
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-01-2004 06:22 AM
тАО03-01-2004 06:22 AM
Re: VG7100 Active Spare
it works like this:
you have a drive fail, and the AHS takes over for it seamlessly, then if you have another failure, you simply have no redundancy. no data-loss. if you are operating in AUTORaid mode, then you can lose even more. you will just sacrifice performance as you go.
For *true* redundancy, you need the VA7110, which has 2 redundancy groups.
Josh
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-01-2004 07:01 AM
тАО03-01-2004 07:01 AM
Re: VG7100 Active Spare
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-01-2004 07:09 AM
тАО03-01-2004 07:09 AM
Re: VG7100 Active Spare
yes, but with 2 RG, you are less likely to lose data with multiple drive failures.
Josh
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-01-2004 07:13 AM
тАО03-01-2004 07:13 AM
Re: VG7100 Active Spare
I was puzzled, because you wrote:
"For *true* redundancy, you need the"
and thought you meant some form of redundany distributed over both RGs.