- Community Home
- >
- Storage
- >
- Entry Storage Systems
- >
- Disk Enclosures
- >
- XP24K and sequential IO issue
Disk Enclosures
1752790
Members
6361
Online
108789
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-14-2007 01:23 PM
11-14-2007 01:23 PM
XP24K and sequential IO issue
Hi All,
I use XP24K for my oracle DB w/ HPuxV3.
We configured storage like this:
fc1 and fc2 -> all LUNs for Data
fc3 and fc4 -> 2 LUSE for Redo , let's call them: LUSE-1, LUSE-2
Redologs are not stripped accross these 2 LUSE: 1 Redolog is dedicated per LUSE.
We followed the best practice guide by telling the system do not load balance IO for these 2 LUSE (in order to let XP detect sequential IO and leverage it).
Unfortunately, the Load balancing was configured with preferred path, and IO are almost all going through 1 Path (not all).
XP detect like 90% Random IO on these LUSE.
Does it come from the loadbalancing even if we have preferred path set ?
What should we do ?
Another documentation say we can disable 1 lunpath. The guys who take care of storage say that if I disable 1 lunpath, i will disable the entire FC connexion ! But I don't think so, since, when invoking disable lupath, you have to provde the HWpath including the WWID of the LUN. Did I miss something ?
Another solution would be to disable legacy mpath, they say that needs a reboot and it's risky. The same doc, they show that they do that on the fly. What do you think ?
I wish my redo would kick more a$# !
Thanks,
JB
I use XP24K for my oracle DB w/ HPuxV3.
We configured storage like this:
fc1 and fc2 -> all LUNs for Data
fc3 and fc4 -> 2 LUSE for Redo , let's call them: LUSE-1, LUSE-2
Redologs are not stripped accross these 2 LUSE: 1 Redolog is dedicated per LUSE.
We followed the best practice guide by telling the system do not load balance IO for these 2 LUSE (in order to let XP detect sequential IO and leverage it).
Unfortunately, the Load balancing was configured with preferred path, and IO are almost all going through 1 Path (not all).
XP detect like 90% Random IO on these LUSE.
Does it come from the loadbalancing even if we have preferred path set ?
What should we do ?
Another documentation say we can disable 1 lunpath. The guys who take care of storage say that if I disable 1 lunpath, i will disable the entire FC connexion ! But I don't think so, since, when invoking disable lupath, you have to provde the HWpath including the WWID of the LUN. Did I miss something ?
Another solution would be to disable legacy mpath, they say that needs a reboot and it's risky. The same doc, they show that they do that on the fly. What do you think ?
I wish my redo would kick more a$# !
Thanks,
JB
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2024 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP