- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- Re: I/O performance on HP-9000 D390 machine
Operating System - HP-UX
1752587
Members
4090
Online
108788
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
юдл
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
юдл
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО11-13-2000 07:58 AM
тАО11-13-2000 07:58 AM
I/O performance on HP-9000 D390 machine
Hello,
I am in the process of comparing I/O performance on sun ultra sparc and HP.
I found that Hp-9000, D390's I/O performance is around 40 % inferior to the I/O performance on ultra-2 using solaris 2.5.
processor speed (which i dont think matters) is almost the same. I am measuring the performance using the following simple program.
#include
#include
#include
#define error
{
printf("Error , errno: %dn",errno);
return 1;
}
main()
{
char buf[8192];
int i=0;
for (i=0; i< 8000; i++)
buf[i]='a';
buf[8000]='0';
FILE *fp = fopen("/export/p2/dali/wrF", "w");
if(!fp) error;
for (i=0; i < 3000; i++)
{
fprintf(fp, "%s",buf);
fsync(fileno(fp));
}
}
Then i use timex cmd to find the time required. I make sure the executable is not on the nfs partition. The directory where i create the file (/export/p2/dali/wrF) is on a local partition. I make sure I delete the file before I run the program.
My questions are
1) Is this an acceptable way of measuring an approximate I/O performance ?
2) Has anybody seen such an inferior performance on HP machine compared to Sun machines ?
Any information in this regard is highly appreciated.
Thanks
I am in the process of comparing I/O performance on sun ultra sparc and HP.
I found that Hp-9000, D390's I/O performance is around 40 % inferior to the I/O performance on ultra-2 using solaris 2.5.
processor speed (which i dont think matters) is almost the same. I am measuring the performance using the following simple program.
#include
#include
#include
#define error
{
printf("Error , errno: %dn",errno);
return 1;
}
main()
{
char buf[8192];
int i=0;
for (i=0; i< 8000; i++)
buf[i]='a';
buf[8000]='0';
FILE *fp = fopen("/export/p2/dali/wrF", "w");
if(!fp) error;
for (i=0; i < 3000; i++)
{
fprintf(fp, "%s",buf);
fsync(fileno(fp));
}
}
Then i use timex cmd to find the time required. I make sure the executable is not on the nfs partition. The directory where i create the file (/export/p2/dali/wrF) is on a local partition. I make sure I delete the file before I run the program.
My questions are
1) Is this an acceptable way of measuring an approximate I/O performance ?
2) Has anybody seen such an inferior performance on HP machine compared to Sun machines ?
Any information in this regard is highly appreciated.
Thanks
3 REPLIES 3
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО11-13-2000 08:13 AM
тАО11-13-2000 08:13 AM
Re: I/O performance on HP-9000 D390 machine
What speed are the disks on your Sun and HP ?
This may explain the difference. Test their speeds using time dd if=/dev/rdsk/... of=/dev/null bs=1024k count=50 (for 50Mb)
Lets see if the disks are of similar performance.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО11-14-2000 05:32 AM
тАО11-14-2000 05:32 AM
Re: I/O performance on HP-9000 D390 machine
Hi.
This may partially result from the bus topology difference between HP and SUN.
If you connected the SCSI interfaces to the
HP-PB bus, that already makes a lot of a difference. If you have done so, try to get interfaces for the HSC bus.
Rgds
Alexander M. Ermes
This may partially result from the bus topology difference between HP and SUN.
If you connected the SCSI interfaces to the
HP-PB bus, that already makes a lot of a difference. If you have done so, try to get interfaces for the HSC bus.
Rgds
Alexander M. Ermes
.. and all these memories are going to vanish like tears in the rain! final words from Rutger Hauer in "Blade Runner"
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО11-14-2000 10:57 PM
тАО11-14-2000 10:57 PM
Re: I/O performance on HP-9000 D390 machine
Hi,
It's difficult to say if you're not comparing apples with oranges...
Are the 2 disks (HP/SUN) of the same type and same capacity ? Comparing a 9Gb disk with a 36Gb one will always give speed measurements in favor of the large capacity disk.
As Carol suggested you, you should use dd and let the Operating System do the 'fsync' for you.
Dan
It's difficult to say if you're not comparing apples with oranges...
Are the 2 disks (HP/SUN) of the same type and same capacity ? Comparing a 9Gb disk with a 36Gb one will always give speed measurements in favor of the large capacity disk.
As Carol suggested you, you should use dd and let the Operating System do the 'fsync' for you.
Dan
Everybody knows at least one thing worth sharing -- mailto:dan.hetzel@wildcroft.com
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2024 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP