ITRC Statistics for March 2009

[Jan van den Ende]

@ Merijn,

It has been some time, but VMS again celebrates a new covered head:

http://forums11.itrc.hp.com/service/forums/questionanswer.do?threadId=1326462

userId=CA1174949

As usual: will you add your fun to the party, please?

TIA

Proost.

Have one on me.

jpe

[unixdaddy]

can we have some stats that show how many people don't award points to questions they've raised? or haven't bothered to identify steps they took to correct a problem. Now that would be interesting.

[V. Nyga]

@unixdaddy - that's all in Merijn's stats:

00 .. 09 % 2460
10 .. 19 % 554
20 .. 29 % 745
30 .. 39 % 799
40 .. 49 % 677
50 .. 59 % 1120
60 .. 69 % 967
70 .. 79 % 811
80 .. 89 % 961
90 .. 99 % 831
100 % 2141
101 .. 109 % 86
110 .. 119 % 13
120 .. 129 % 4
130 .. 139 % 5
140 .. 149 % 2
150 .. 159 % 5
200 .. 209 % 4
220 .. 229 % 1
300 .. 309 % 1
Average: 53.8 %

Enjoy, Have FUN! H.Merijn

All above 100% is a know 'bug'.
All below 100% is a lack of feedback, if intended or not ... I don't know.

Volkmar

[Pete Randall]

You might want to do some minimal research before you ask.

From Merijn's comments:

http://mirrors.develooper.com/hpux/stats.html takes an attempt in explaining all the numbers. I hope to have explained the FAQ's there.

If you looked there you might find that this is already answered for you:

00 .. 09 % 2460


Pete

[Steven E. Protter]

Shalom (-5 points desired),

Post splitting as Pete pointed out.

I usually don't notice what other do other than to check that prior answers in the thread cover my answer so I can decide whether to add value or pass on the thread.

Post splitting for the accumulation of points is inappropriate and I started noticing it and pointing it out when I saw it.

This is a community. You get to the top by hard work and persistence, not gimmicks.

I've noticed that when I (occasionally) go back and add a second post with thoughts that erupted from my pea brain molecules after I posted a response. Often the thread owner will instead of awarding 10 points per post split the points among the two posts, or leave the second response unpointed.

I encourage this and on my future questions will make sure post splitting provides no benefit to the person doing it.

Good Point Pete.

Keep on keeping people honest.

SEP

[Pete Randall]

> (-5 points desired)

Maybe - if you'd disagreed, that is.

;^)


Pete