OPatch java-exception with 9.2.0.5

[Volker Borowski]

Hi,

have installed OPatch Version 43 and 48.
Both versions did work (i.e. lsinventory) with 9.2.0.4.

Patched 9.2.0.5 (and oui 10.1 as required).
Now both OPatch versions (43 and 48) throw java-eceptions for a DATE-Format issue.

sInstallTime = >2003.Nov.11 14:34:37 MET<
java.text.ParseException: Unparseable date: "2003.Nov.11 14:34:37 MET"

Well, it is pretty clear, that the dots are the Problem, but how to reformat that field ?

Environment LANG=en_US

Ideas welcome.
Metalink and SAPNET have nothing on this.
Call is open, but may be you guys are quicker :-)

Thanks
Volker

[Eric Antunes]

See your nls_date_format. It should be set to something like this (with - and not .):

nls_date_format = DD-MON-RRRR

[Eric Antunes]

Sorry, I forgot to tell you where you can see nls_date_format: it is set on init.ora ($ORACLE_HOME/dbs/init.ora on 8i)

[Eric Antunes]

One more thing,

On Metalink they say to apply patch 2370146 (see Note 199271.1)

[Volker Borowski]

Hi,

thanks for the suggestion.
Basicly the databas is not up and running while applying a bugfix, so no init.ora Parameter will change anything.

Nevertheless, I tried out to use NLS_TIMESTAMP_TZ_FORMAT in the environment, but it appears, that OPatch does not use any NLS.. environments.

This looks like a JAVA problem for me, and I suspect some locale <-> LANG problem, but locale en_US is installed, LANG set accordingly, and this User has never run anything diffrent than en_US.

More Ideas ?
Volker

[Eric Antunes]

I've searched Metalink with the expression:

java.text.ParseException: Unparseable date

And got 3 matches:

Notes 199271.1, 243100.1 and 221410.1

[Sanjay Kumar Suri]

Hello Volker

Recently we did an upgrade. Look at the attached document (if it helps).

sks

[Volker Borowski]

Antunes:

I found those notes also. None of them is related to the use of OPatch, as far as I see.

Sanjay:

Nice Document. I am right in the middle, and prior updateing the system-tables, I need to apply two bugfixes.

Volker

[Eric Antunes]

Hi Volker,

Yes, they aren't related with OPatch...

Have you seen bug 3558215? This is the only document I see on Metalink about your issue...

[Volker Borowski]

... yes, that is exactly my problem.
Shows me that one has to check "bug database" in addition on advanced search :-)

Unfortunately no solution....

Volker