- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - Linux
- >
- Single Path vs. QLogic Failover
Operating System - Linux
1752619
Members
4414
Online
108788
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
юдл
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
юдл
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО11-03-2006 04:47 AM
тАО11-03-2006 04:47 AM
Single Path vs. QLogic Failover
I've two BL20p G3 attached to an MSA1000 w/ 12 mirrored disks (6 on channel A + 6 on channel B) w/ redundant controller, running RHEL4-U4 x86_64 w/ PSP 7.60 drivers.
If i select "SinglePath" when configuring HBA it has a strange behavior: on both nodes, 'fdisk' reports /dev/sdg-h-i-j-k-l and not /dev/sda-b-c-d-e-f
If i select "QLogicFailover", 'fdisk' simply doesn't load /dev/sdX, despite 'lssd' command from 'fibreutils' reports on both nodes:
sda 0,0,0,1 COMPAQ MSA1000 VOLUME 4.48
sdb 0,0,0,2 COMPAQ MSA1000 VOLUME 4.48
sdc 0,0,0,3 COMPAQ MSA1000 VOLUME 4.48
sdd 0,0,0,4 COMPAQ MSA1000 VOLUME 4.48
sde 0,0,0,5 COMPAQ MSA1000 VOLUME 4.48
sdf 0,0,0,6 COMPAQ MSA1000 VOLUME 4.48
First beginners question: once i have a redundant controller and last drivers, i should use "QLogicFailover", right?!
Second question: should i see /dev/sda,b,c,d,e,f for the first node end /dev/sdg,h,i,j,k,l for the second node or should they be equal?
Thx
If i select "SinglePath" when configuring HBA it has a strange behavior: on both nodes, 'fdisk' reports /dev/sdg-h-i-j-k-l and not /dev/sda-b-c-d-e-f
If i select "QLogicFailover", 'fdisk' simply doesn't load /dev/sdX, despite 'lssd' command from 'fibreutils' reports on both nodes:
sda 0,0,0,1 COMPAQ MSA1000 VOLUME 4.48
sdb 0,0,0,2 COMPAQ MSA1000 VOLUME 4.48
sdc 0,0,0,3 COMPAQ MSA1000 VOLUME 4.48
sdd 0,0,0,4 COMPAQ MSA1000 VOLUME 4.48
sde 0,0,0,5 COMPAQ MSA1000 VOLUME 4.48
sdf 0,0,0,6 COMPAQ MSA1000 VOLUME 4.48
First beginners question: once i have a redundant controller and last drivers, i should use "QLogicFailover", right?!
Second question: should i see /dev/sda,b,c,d,e,f for the first node end /dev/sdg,h,i,j,k,l for the second node or should they be equal?
Thx
2 REPLIES 2
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО11-03-2006 05:34 AM
тАО11-03-2006 05:34 AM
Re: Single Path vs. QLogic Failover
First beginners question: once i have a redundant controller and last drivers, i should use "QLogicFailover", right?!
Yes, you should use qlogic failover for hosts with multiple redundant HBAs.
Second question: should i see /dev/sda,b,c,d,e,f for the first node end /dev/sdg,h,i,j,k,l for the second node or should they be equal?
You cannot warranty that would be equal but could be. It depends of the SCSI devices attached and the discovery order. Normally, if the hardware is very similar (internal disks, and so) the device files can be the same in the servers.
Yes, you should use qlogic failover for hosts with multiple redundant HBAs.
Second question: should i see /dev/sda,b,c,d,e,f for the first node end /dev/sdg,h,i,j,k,l for the second node or should they be equal?
You cannot warranty that would be equal but could be. It depends of the SCSI devices attached and the discovery order. Normally, if the hardware is very similar (internal disks, and so) the device files can be the same in the servers.
Por que hacerlo dificil si es posible hacerlo facil? - Why do it the hard way, when you can do it the easy way?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО11-03-2006 06:54 AM
тАО11-03-2006 06:54 AM
Re: Single Path vs. QLogic Failover
Some more hits about the configuration:
i) The contents of '/etc/modprobe.conf' that confirms QLogicFailover driver:
options qla2xxx ql2xmaxqdepth=16 qlport_down_retry=30 ql2xloginretrycount=16 ql2xfailover=1 ql2xlbType=1 ql2xautorestore=0x80
remove qla2xxx /sbin/modprobe -r --first-time --ignore-remove qla2xxx && { /sbin/modprobe -r --ignore-remove qla2xxx_conf; }
resulting '/etc/hp_qla2x00.conf':
qdepth = 16
port_down_retry_count = 30
login_retry_count = 16
failover = 1
load_balancing = 1
excludemodel = 0x0
auto_restore = 0x80
ii) The contents of '/var/log/messages' i can allways see entrys like:
kernel: Buffer I/O error on device sdX, logical block 0
The thruth is that 'fdisk' only see partitions at '/dev/cciss/c0d0' and none at '/dev/cciss/c0d1'
Thx
i) The contents of '/etc/modprobe.conf' that confirms QLogicFailover driver:
options qla2xxx ql2xmaxqdepth=16 qlport_down_retry=30 ql2xloginretrycount=16 ql2xfailover=1 ql2xlbType=1 ql2xautorestore=0x80
remove qla2xxx /sbin/modprobe -r --first-time --ignore-remove qla2xxx && { /sbin/modprobe -r --ignore-remove qla2xxx_conf; }
resulting '/etc/hp_qla2x00.conf':
qdepth = 16
port_down_retry_count = 30
login_retry_count = 16
failover = 1
load_balancing = 1
excludemodel = 0x0
auto_restore = 0x80
ii) The contents of '/var/log/messages' i can allways see entrys like:
kernel: Buffer I/O error on device sdX, logical block 0
The thruth is that 'fdisk' only see partitions at '/dev/cciss/c0d0' and none at '/dev/cciss/c0d1'
Thx
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2024 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP