Simpler Navigation for Servers and Operating Systems - Please Update Your Bookmarks
Completed: a much simpler Servers and Operating Systems section of the Community. We combined many of the older boards, so you won't have to click through so many levels to get at the information you need. Check the consolidated boards here as many sub-forums are now single boards.
If you have bookmarked forums or discussion boards in Servers and Operating Systems, we suggest you check and update them as needed.
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

WLM vs PRM

Leroy_1
Occasional Visitor

WLM vs PRM

If i assume i'm not using Goals Based SLOs.
If WLM is only a modifier of the prmconf, how can we define priorities if WLM acts only when CPU usage is 100% (prm fonctionnality without capping).

Regards
1 REPLY
Highlighted
Steven Landherr
Occasional Visitor

Re: WLM vs PRM

The PRM configuration that WLM generates always has PRM CPU capping enabled. By doing so, WLM will always be able to control the amount of CPU given to each workload. With no goals defined, the WLM configuration can simply be viewed as a PRM configuration with fixed CPU caps.

In the absence of performance goals, WLM can still prioritize workloads on a system.

You can create service level objectives (SLOs) with a CPU usage goal. These goals do not require external metrics and will try to give a workload more CPU when it is busy and less when it is idle.

You can also use the weight keyword to indicate the relative importance of each workload, then turn on the distribute_excess tunable to have WLM equitably share the CPU cycles amoung the workloads.