- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - Linux
- >
- Re: What gives better db performance, more memory ...
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО06-12-2008 08:01 AM
тАО06-12-2008 08:01 AM
4GB memory / single 1066MHz Xeon Processor
OR
2GB memory / dual 1066MHz Xeon Processors
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО06-12-2008 10:22 AM
тАО06-12-2008 10:22 AM
Re: What gives better db performance, more memory or add'l processor
http://h18004.www1.hp.com/products/servers/benchmarks/
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО06-12-2008 01:05 PM
тАО06-12-2008 01:05 PM
Re: What gives better db performance, more memory or add'l processor
So, the answer is neither.
Go with 8GB Memory and dual Xeon Processors.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО06-12-2008 01:33 PM
тАО06-12-2008 01:33 PM
Re: What gives better db performance, more memory or add'l processor
> memory or add'l processor
That rather depends on whether the system is
CPU-bound or out of memory. You might be
wise to see why the HP-UX system is too slow
(assuming that that's why you plan to move
away from it). How much memory does the
HP-UX system have? Does _it_ need more? Is
its CPU max'ed out? I don't do perfomance
analysis on HP-UX, so I know nothing, but I'd
bet that there is a big toolkit somewhere for
just that purpose.
You can either find the existing bottleneck,
or you can guess, or you can just throw
hardware at the problem to see if anything
helps. How big is your budget?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО06-12-2008 01:50 PM
тАО06-12-2008 01:50 PM
Re: What gives better db performance, more memory or add'l processor
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО06-12-2008 02:10 PM
тАО06-12-2008 02:10 PM
SolutionThe processor probably would be dual core o hipertheading enabled.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО06-12-2008 07:34 PM
тАО06-12-2008 07:34 PM
Re: What gives better db performance, more memory or add'l processor
> current server [...]
Well, that explains why you'd want to replace
it.
> [...] it is obsolete.
Where "obsolete" = "working fine"?
> [...] How much memory does the HP-UX
> system have? Does _it_ need more? [...]
Assuming that "issues" and "problems" are
similar, then, apparently, however much
memory it has is probably enough. Why
didn't I think to ask how much that was? No,
wait. I did. Still wondering, then.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО06-13-2008 04:20 AM
тАО06-13-2008 04:20 AM
Re: What gives better db performance, more memory or add'l processor
For all of those "wondering" -- the current system has only 512 MB of memory, not having real performance issues, but, its on un-supported OS and unsupported hardware-- so we are replacing it. You obviously can't even buy a server with 512 MB these days and the extra 2GB memory or extra processor cost about the same. So, I just wondered which one is best to run a small database? I'm trying to get this customer the best configuration that their budget can buy, since today's h/w dollars can buy so much more.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО06-13-2008 05:05 AM
тАО06-13-2008 05:05 AM
Re: What gives better db performance, more memory or add'l processor
> memory, not having real performance issues
> [...]
Knowing nothing, I'd guess that if 512MB was
enough before, then 2GB would probably be
enough now, and the other CPU probably
couldn't hurt. Of course, if the old CPU
wasn't being kept busy, then adding a second
(presumably faster) one probably wouldn't
help any more than adding additional memory
which won't get used, either.