- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- Re: fsadm failed due to 100%
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-15-2005 01:37 PM
тАО03-15-2005 01:37 PM
When I tried to extend a filesystem that is 100% full using fsadm I got the following errors.
fsadm: attempt to resize /dev/vgtradat/rlvtradata2 failed with errno 28
The problem is the file system is too full. I just wondering can I umount this filesystem and using extendfs instead of fsadm since this filesystem contain the oracle database datafile I cannot move it.
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-15-2005 01:48 PM
тАО03-15-2005 01:48 PM
Solutiondo u have online JFS? with that, u should be able to use fsadm without un-mounting the file system.
also, if u have online JFS, was your steps as follows?
# lvextend -L "size in MB" dev/vgtradat/lvtradata2
# fsadm -F vxfs -b "size in kb" "mount point"
regards.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-15-2005 01:55 PM
тАО03-15-2005 01:55 PM
Re: fsadm failed due to 100%
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-15-2005 02:11 PM
тАО03-15-2005 02:11 PM
Re: fsadm failed due to 100%
understand that there are oracle datafiles in that file system. will it be possible to reduce some of the datafiles, i.e. those with more free tablespace, then run online afterwhich u may increase the tablespace again. also, u may like to check if there are any core files in that file system.
if that is not possible, u have to shutdown the database and unmount the filesystem before extending.
regards.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-15-2005 02:28 PM
тАО03-15-2005 02:28 PM
Re: fsadm failed due to 100%
Why don't you "extendfs" instead of fsadm?
Normally, when you use fsadm command, it will recreate all that LV.
And another idea:
Try with fsck command to check consistency and interactive repair.
Goodluck!
HoangChiCong
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-15-2005 02:56 PM
тАО03-15-2005 02:56 PM
Re: fsadm failed due to 100%
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-16-2005 01:00 AM
тАО03-16-2005 01:00 AM
Re: fsadm failed due to 100%
With all this royalty answering your posting, I'm not sure a Hogwarts wizard, like myself, has anything better to offer you. :) However, here is my recommendation:
As stated the FS is 100%, and since it is an Oracle datafile, moving it is not an option. Therefore, fsadm is not an option.
Also, you mentioned umount and extendfs as an option; which leads me to believe booting into Single-user mode is an option.
Therefore, I recommend booting into single-user mode, using extendfs to increase your size, booting back to your normal runlevel...and living life as carefree as possible until Oracle fills up the directory again. Should take about 5 minutes, right? The resource hogs! ;)
Here are a couple links to help answer questions further, if you need them:
http://www1.itrc.hp.com/service/cki/docDisplay.do?docLocale=en_US&docId=200000065011408
http://www1.itrc.hp.com/service/cki/docDisplay.do?docLocale=en_US&docId=200000076281315
Hope this helps...
Dwyane
PS...hope I haven't offended anyone, all comments in good fun... :) All royalty needs a court gester :)
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-16-2005 01:59 AM
тАО03-16-2005 01:59 AM
Re: fsadm failed due to 100%
Rgds...Geoff
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-16-2005 01:10 PM
тАО03-16-2005 01:10 PM
Re: fsadm failed due to 100%
http://forums1.itrc.hp.com/service/forums/publicProfile.do?userId=CA610806&forumId=1
"assigned points to 178 of 669 responses"
You need to assign point to everyone who takes time to help you.
0 point for this thread!
Thanks
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-16-2005 06:12 PM
тАО03-16-2005 06:12 PM
Re: fsadm failed due to 100%
Do not extend more than juse one PE/LE. Each time just add one PE. The reason is when you start extending the LVM tries to extend the LVM structures first and after than Data. if the FS is 100% you have to extend just with one PE.
very easy with lvmextend. and after lvmextend use fsadm also.[after extending with one PE]. and repeat this extending with 1PE as many times as you want to extend that filesystems.
No umounting is necessary and it is not necessary to use extendfs if you have OnlineJFS installed on the system.
If this doesn't help than I'm affraid that you don't have OnlineJFS or the FS is filled too much. But whenever I tried to extend with one PE and fsadm that mountpoint event the FS was 100% it was possible.
Please try it and provide feedback if it has helped to you.