- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- no locks available
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО05-21-2002 04:47 AM
тАО05-21-2002 04:47 AM
cannot lockf(....): No locks available.
If I'm not mistaken, there is an flocks kernal parameter. Does this need to be increased?
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО05-21-2002 04:53 AM
тАО05-21-2002 04:53 AM
SolutionFrom SAM's help on configurable parameters for nflocks;
Description
nflocks gives the maximum number of file/record locks that are
available system-wide. When choosing this number, note that one file
may have several locks and databases that use lockf() may need
an exceptionally large number of locks.
Open and locked files consume memory and other system resources.
These resources must be balanced against other system needs to
maintain optimum overall system performance. Achieving an optimum
balance can be quite complex, especially on large systems, because of
wide variation in the kinds of applications being used on each system
and the number and types of applications that might be running
simultaneously, the number of local and/or remote users on the
system, and many other factors.
Related Parameters
None.
I'd try increasing it.
Pete
Pete
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО05-21-2002 04:54 AM
тАО05-21-2002 04:54 AM
Re: no locks available
Yes, I would increase the kernel parameter 'nflocks'. 'nflocks' controls the maximum number of file locks available system-wide to all processes.
Regards!
...JRF...
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО05-21-2002 05:10 AM
тАО05-21-2002 05:10 AM
Re: no locks available
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО05-22-2002 05:35 AM
тАО05-22-2002 05:35 AM
Re: no locks available
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО05-22-2002 05:44 AM
тАО05-22-2002 05:44 AM
Re: no locks available
Also you can monitor is using glance--->next keys---->Stystabls.
This will give you the real time usage , but increase it first.
Manoj Srivastava