- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- Re: why lano is different status between lancan an...
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО07-20-2010 01:28 AM
тАО07-20-2010 01:28 AM
SolutionIf so, you need to verify your cables, switch ports etc.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО07-20-2010 01:34 AM
тАО07-20-2010 01:34 AM
Re: why lano is different status between lancan and cmviewcl?
# nwmgr -g -v -c lan22
lan2:
Interface State =DOWN
Probable Cause for State = Cable disconnect
MAC Address = 0x001A41234567
Subsystem = iether
Interface Type = 1000Base-T
Hardware Path = 0/3/1/0
NMID = 33
Feature Capabilities = Physical Interface
IPV4 Recv CKO
IPV4 Send CKO
VLAN Tag Offload
64Bit MIB Support
IPV4 TCP Segmentation Offload
UDP Multifrag CKO
Feature Settings = Physical Interface
VLAN Tag Offload
64Bit MIB Support
MTU = 1500
Speed = Autonegotiation : On
The link is down. Speed and other link state information are undefined.
Only the configured speed is shown.
Hope this helps!
Regards
Torsten.
__________________________________________________
There are only 10 types of people in the world -
those who understand binary, and those who don't.
__________________________________________________
No support by private messages. Please ask the forum!
If you feel this was helpful please click the KUDOS! thumb below!
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО07-20-2010 01:46 AM
тАО07-20-2010 01:46 AM
Re: why lano is different status between lancan and cmviewcl?
# ioscan -fnC lan
Class I H/W Path Driver S/W State H/W Type Description
===================================================================
lan 0 0/4/2/0 iether CLAIMED INTERFACE HP AB352-60003 PCI/PCI-X 1000Base-T Dual-port Core
lan 1 0/4/2/1 iether CLAIMED INTERFACE HP AB352-60003 PCI/PCI-X 1000Base-T Dual-port Core
root@bandao:/ #
root@bandao:/ # nwmgr -g -v -c lan1
lan1:
Interface State =DOWN
Probable Cause for State = Cable disconnect
MAC Address = 0x001A4B070773
Subsystem = iether
Interface Type = 1000Base-T
Hardware Path = 0/4/2/1
NMID = 2
Feature Capabilities = Physical Interface
IPV4 Recv CKO
IPV4 Send CKO
VLAN Tag Offload
64Bit MIB Support
IPV4 TCP Segmentation Offload
UDP Multifrag CKO
Feature Settings = Physical Interface
VLAN Tag Offload
64Bit MIB Support
MTU = 1500
Speed = Autonegotiation : On
The link is down. Speed and other link state information are undefined.
Only the configured speed is shown.
# ioscan -fnC lan
Class I H/W Path Driver S/W State H/W Type Description
===================================================================
lan 0 0/4/2/0 iether CLAIMED INTERFACE HP AB352-60003 PCI/PCI-X 1000Base-T Dual-port Core
lan 1 0/4/2/1 iether CLAIMED INTERFACE HP AB352-60003 PCI/PCI-X 1000Base-T Dual-port Core
root@bandao:/ #
root@bandao:/ # nwmgr -g -v -c lan1
lan1:
Interface State =DOWN
Probable Cause for State = Cable disconnect
MAC Address = 0x001A4B070773
Subsystem = iether
Interface Type = 1000Base-T
Hardware Path = 0/4/2/1
NMID = 2
Feature Capabilities = Physical Interface
IPV4 Recv CKO
IPV4 Send CKO
VLAN Tag Offload
64Bit MIB Support
IPV4 TCP Segmentation Offload
UDP Multifrag CKO
Feature Settings = Physical Interface
VLAN Tag Offload
64Bit MIB Support
MTU = 1500
Speed = Autonegotiation : On
The link is down. Speed and other link state information are undefined.
Only the configured speed is shown.
now, if I could check port and cable ?but I only access to it via net,thanks!
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО07-20-2010 01:50 AM
тАО07-20-2010 01:50 AM
Re: why lano is different status between lancan and cmviewcl?
Hope this helps!
Regards
Torsten.
__________________________________________________
There are only 10 types of people in the world -
those who understand binary, and those who don't.
__________________________________________________
No support by private messages. Please ask the forum!
If you feel this was helpful please click the KUDOS! thumb below!
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО07-20-2010 01:59 AM
тАО07-20-2010 01:59 AM
Re: why lano is different status between lancan and cmviewcl?
I think lan can should run well due to ioscan output show the status is claim,
as for switch port , how to know lan card connect to which switch port? thanks!
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО07-20-2010 02:02 AM
тАО07-20-2010 02:02 AM
Re: why lano is different status between lancan and cmviewcl?
Consider to logon to the switch and check the ports. Normally the MAC will be shown, but without a connection you need to refer to your own documentation of cabling.
Hope this helps!
Regards
Torsten.
__________________________________________________
There are only 10 types of people in the world -
those who understand binary, and those who don't.
__________________________________________________
No support by private messages. Please ask the forum!
If you feel this was helpful please click the KUDOS! thumb below!
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО07-20-2010 02:07 AM
тАО07-20-2010 02:07 AM
Re: why lano is different status between lancan and cmviewcl?
Get the switch checked out
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО07-20-2010 02:07 AM
тАО07-20-2010 02:07 AM
Re: why lano is different status between lancan and cmviewcl?
Thanks for you so nice support,
but I really do not know how to check the ports of NIC ?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО07-20-2010 02:31 AM
тАО07-20-2010 02:31 AM
Re: why lano is different status between lancan and cmviewcl?
If you get "link up", cable and port are ok.
Hope this helps!
Regards
Torsten.
__________________________________________________
There are only 10 types of people in the world -
those who understand binary, and those who don't.
__________________________________________________
No support by private messages. Please ask the forum!
If you feel this was helpful please click the KUDOS! thumb below!
- « Previous
-
- 1
- 2
- Next »