General
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

why lano is different status between lancan and cmviewcl?

SOLVED
Go to solution
study unix
Regular Advisor

why lano is different status between lancan and cmviewcl?

cmviewcl -v
CLUSTER STATUS
clsmp up
NODE STATUS STATE
msmp1 up running
Network_Parameters:
INTERFACE STATUS PATH NAME
PRIMARY down 10/4/8 lan0
PRIMARY up 10/12/6 lan1
STANDBY up 10/16/8 lan2


lanscan
Hardware Station Crd Hardware Net-Interface NM MAC HP DLPI Mjr
Path Address In# State NameUnit State ID Type Support Num
10/16/8 0x0010839660C0 2 UP lan2 UP 4 ETHER Yes 173
10/4/8 0x0010839660C1 0 UP lan0 DOWN 5 ETHER Yes 173
10/12/6 0x001083B95091 1 UP lan1 UP 6 ETHER Yes 52
18 REPLIES
Asif Sharif
Honored Contributor

Re: why lano is different status between lancan and cmviewcl?

Hi,

Both are showing Down status.

PRIMARY down 10/4/8 lan0
lan0 DOWN 5 ETHER Yes 173

Regards,
Asif Sharif
study unix
Regular Advisor

Re: why lano is different status between lancan and cmviewcl?

Hi ,
the correct lan output as below,
Hardware Station Crd Hardware Net-Interface NM MAC HP DLPI Mjr
Path Address In# State State ID Type Support Num
10/16/8 0x0010839660C0 2 UP lan2 4 ETHER Yes 173
10/4/8 0x0010839660C1 0 UP lan0 5 ETHER Yes 173
10/12/6 0x001083B95091 1 UP lan1 6 ETHER Yes 52
S.N.S
Valued Contributor

Re: why lano is different status between lancan and cmviewcl?

Hi Eye,

Pls give us the cmscancl and cmviewcl outputs

SNS
"Genius is 1% inspiration, 99% Perspiration" - Edison
Torsten.
Acclaimed Contributor

Re: why lano is different status between lancan and cmviewcl?

Both were DOWN, now you (somehow) toggled it to be "UP" - did you check the cluster after this?

Hope this helps!
Regards
Torsten.

__________________________________________________
There are only 10 types of people in the world -
those who understand binary, and those who don't.

__________________________________________________
No support by private messages. Please ask the forum!

If you feel this was helpful please click the KUDOS! thumb below!   

Re: why lano is different status between lancan and cmviewcl?

cmviewcl output shows the state of the link, so it is telling you there is a link issue.
lanscan shows the state of the hardaware (NIC) and then the link state, hence the card is ok, bit again th elink is DOWN.

If you are on HP-UX 11.31, use nwmgr, as this will show each NIC and whether the LINK is up or down.
My house is the bank's, my money the wife's, But my opinions belong to me, not HP!
study unix
Regular Advisor

Re: why lano is different status between lancan and cmviewcl?

Hi Melvyn,
If I use command linkoop the same to nwmgr ?
study unix
Regular Advisor

Re: why lano is different status between lancan and cmviewcl?

Hi Melven,
I login one server, and impletment the command " nwmgr and lanscan", as a reslut, lan1 is diffrent status, as below, thanks!
#nwmgr
Name/ Interface Station Sub- Interface Related
ClassInstance State Address system Type Interface
============== ========= ============== ======== ============== =========
lan0 UP 0x001A4B070772 iether 1000Base-T
lan1 DOWN 0x001A4B070773 iether 1000Base-T
lan900 DOWN 0x000000000000 hp_apa hp_apa
lan901 DOWN 0x000000000000 hp_apa hp_apa
lan902 DOWN 0x000000000000 hp_apa hp_apa
lan903 DOWN 0x000000000000 hp_apa hp_apa
lan904 DOWN 0x000000000000
hp_apa hp_apa

#lanscan
Hardware Station Crd Hdw Net-Interface NM MAC HP-DLPI DLPI
Path Address In# State NamePPA ID Type Support Mjr#
0/4/2/0 0x001A4B070772 0 UP lan0 snap0 1 ETHER Yes 119
0/4/2/1 0x001A4B070773 1 UP lan1 snap1 2 ETHER Yes 119
LinkAgg0 0x000000000000 900 DOWN lan900 snap900 4 ETHER Yes 119
LinkAgg1 0x000000000000 901 DOWN lan901 snap901 5 ETHER Yes 119
LinkAgg2 0x000000000000 902 DOWN lan902 snap902 6 ETHER Yes 119
LinkAgg3 0x000000000000 903 DOWN lan903 snap903 7 ETHER Yes 119
LinkAgg4 0x000000000000 904 DOWN lan904 snap904 8 ETHER Yes 119

Re: why lano is different status between lancan and cmviewcl?

Well these are different to your origional query, but here goes:
#nwmgr

lan0 UP 0x001A4B070772 iether 1000Base-T
lan1 DOWN 0x001A4B070773 iether 1000Base-T

This shows that lan1 has no working LINK

#lanscan

0/4/2/0 0x001A4B070772 0 UP lan0 snap0 1
0/4/2/1 0x001A4B070773 1 UP lan1 snap1 2
This shows that the lan1 HARDWARE appears ok.

depending upon your supposed connectivity, you could try using linkloop to test, but it looks like you have a connectivity issue on lan1
My house is the bank's, my money the wife's, But my opinions belong to me, not HP!
study unix
Regular Advisor

Re: why lano is different status between lancan and cmviewcl?

Hi All,
Thanks for your reply,
I found the root reason is from syslog,lan card ever happened fail so that cmviewcl output shows one lan card statsu is down, so I use command commodnet -e lancard to enable it,now it is ok, thanks!

Hi Melvyn,
I use linkloop to check the connective between lan 0 and lan1, pls kindly provide some solution how to resolve it,thanks!
linkloop -i 1 0x001A4B070772
Link connectivity to LAN station: 0x001A4B070772
error: expected primitive 0x30, got DL_ERROR_ACK
dl_error_primitive = 0x2d
dl_errno = 0x04
dl_unix_errno = 57
error - did not receive data part of message
Solution

Re: why lano is different status between lancan and cmviewcl?

well, is there SUPPOSED to be physical connectivity between lan0 and lan1?
If so, you need to verify your cables, switch ports etc.
My house is the bank's, my money the wife's, But my opinions belong to me, not HP!
Torsten.
Acclaimed Contributor

Re: why lano is different status between lancan and cmviewcl?

Try this for both - example:


# nwmgr -g -v -c lan22
lan2:
Interface State =DOWN
Probable Cause for State = Cable disconnect
MAC Address = 0x001A41234567
Subsystem = iether
Interface Type = 1000Base-T
Hardware Path = 0/3/1/0
NMID = 33
Feature Capabilities = Physical Interface
IPV4 Recv CKO
IPV4 Send CKO
VLAN Tag Offload
64Bit MIB Support
IPV4 TCP Segmentation Offload
UDP Multifrag CKO
Feature Settings = Physical Interface
VLAN Tag Offload
64Bit MIB Support
MTU = 1500
Speed = Autonegotiation : On
The link is down. Speed and other link state information are undefined.
Only the configured speed is shown.

Hope this helps!
Regards
Torsten.

__________________________________________________
There are only 10 types of people in the world -
those who understand binary, and those who don't.

__________________________________________________
No support by private messages. Please ask the forum!

If you feel this was helpful please click the KUDOS! thumb below!   
study unix
Regular Advisor

Re: why lano is different status between lancan and cmviewcl?

Hi Torsten,
# ioscan -fnC lan
Class I H/W Path Driver S/W State H/W Type Description
===================================================================
lan 0 0/4/2/0 iether CLAIMED INTERFACE HP AB352-60003 PCI/PCI-X 1000Base-T Dual-port Core
lan 1 0/4/2/1 iether CLAIMED INTERFACE HP AB352-60003 PCI/PCI-X 1000Base-T Dual-port Core
root@bandao:/ #
root@bandao:/ # nwmgr -g -v -c lan1
lan1:
Interface State =DOWN
Probable Cause for State = Cable disconnect
MAC Address = 0x001A4B070773
Subsystem = iether
Interface Type = 1000Base-T
Hardware Path = 0/4/2/1
NMID = 2
Feature Capabilities = Physical Interface
IPV4 Recv CKO
IPV4 Send CKO
VLAN Tag Offload
64Bit MIB Support
IPV4 TCP Segmentation Offload
UDP Multifrag CKO
Feature Settings = Physical Interface
VLAN Tag Offload
64Bit MIB Support
MTU = 1500
Speed = Autonegotiation : On
The link is down. Speed and other link state information are undefined.
Only the configured speed is shown.

# ioscan -fnC lan
Class I H/W Path Driver S/W State H/W Type Description
===================================================================
lan 0 0/4/2/0 iether CLAIMED INTERFACE HP AB352-60003 PCI/PCI-X 1000Base-T Dual-port Core
lan 1 0/4/2/1 iether CLAIMED INTERFACE HP AB352-60003 PCI/PCI-X 1000Base-T Dual-port Core
root@bandao:/ #
root@bandao:/ # nwmgr -g -v -c lan1
lan1:
Interface State =DOWN
Probable Cause for State = Cable disconnect
MAC Address = 0x001A4B070773
Subsystem = iether
Interface Type = 1000Base-T
Hardware Path = 0/4/2/1
NMID = 2
Feature Capabilities = Physical Interface
IPV4 Recv CKO
IPV4 Send CKO
VLAN Tag Offload
64Bit MIB Support
IPV4 TCP Segmentation Offload
UDP Multifrag CKO
Feature Settings = Physical Interface
VLAN Tag Offload
64Bit MIB Support
MTU = 1500
Speed = Autonegotiation : On
The link is down. Speed and other link state information are undefined.
Only the configured speed is shown.

now, if I could check port and cable ?but I only access to it via net,thanks!
Torsten.
Acclaimed Contributor

Re: why lano is different status between lancan and cmviewcl?

Could be a bad card (port); bad cable or bad switch (port) - check them all. Of course you cannot check the cable from remote ... ;-)

Hope this helps!
Regards
Torsten.

__________________________________________________
There are only 10 types of people in the world -
those who understand binary, and those who don't.

__________________________________________________
No support by private messages. Please ask the forum!

If you feel this was helpful please click the KUDOS! thumb below!   
study unix
Regular Advisor

Re: why lano is different status between lancan and cmviewcl?

Hi Torsten,
I think lan can should run well due to ioscan output show the status is claim,
as for switch port , how to know lan card connect to which switch port? thanks!
Torsten.
Acclaimed Contributor

Re: why lano is different status between lancan and cmviewcl?

ioscan only says the card is alive, it says nothing about the ports of the NIC.

Consider to logon to the switch and check the ports. Normally the MAC will be shown, but without a connection you need to refer to your own documentation of cabling.

Hope this helps!
Regards
Torsten.

__________________________________________________
There are only 10 types of people in the world -
those who understand binary, and those who don't.

__________________________________________________
No support by private messages. Please ask the forum!

If you feel this was helpful please click the KUDOS! thumb below!   

Re: why lano is different status between lancan and cmviewcl?

you will need to get your networking team to help here, as this could be a number of items. As Torsten says, the NIC card is ok, but a PORT on the card may be faulty, more likely a cable or networking device like a switch.
Get the switch checked out
My house is the bank's, my money the wife's, But my opinions belong to me, not HP!
study unix
Regular Advisor

Re: why lano is different status between lancan and cmviewcl?

Hi Torsten,
Thanks for you so nice support,
but I really do not know how to check the ports of NIC ?
Torsten.
Acclaimed Contributor

Re: why lano is different status between lancan and cmviewcl?

Well, to check a port you must connect "something" there, even a cable (connect the other end "somewhere") or a loopback connector.

If you get "link up", cable and port are ok.

Hope this helps!
Regards
Torsten.

__________________________________________________
There are only 10 types of people in the world -
those who understand binary, and those who don't.

__________________________________________________
No support by private messages. Please ask the forum!

If you feel this was helpful please click the KUDOS! thumb below!