Simpler Navigation for Servers and Operating Systems - Please Update Your Bookmarks
Completed: a much simpler Servers and Operating Systems section of the Community. We combined many of the older boards, so you won't have to click through so many levels to get at the information you need. Check the consolidated boards here as many sub-forums are now single boards.
If you have bookmarked forums or discussion boards in Servers and Operating Systems, we suggest you check and update them as needed.
HP 9000 and HP e3000 Servers
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Relative performance index

colin findlay
Occasional Visitor

Relative performance index

Does anyone know of a relative performance index for the HP3000 range which includes both the 979-200 and the 957RX ?

 

 

P.S. This thread has been moved from General to HP e3000. - Hp Forum Moderator

1 REPLY
Eric Sorensen_1
Honored Contributor

Re: Relative performance index

Hello Colin,

The 979-200 is 7.0 times faster than a 957 (RX and SX are the same speed).

Here is a link to an Excel table, showing both the 957 and the 979-200:

http://workdog.rose.hp.com/perf/table.xls

Whoops! Sorry, this link is not externally-viewable... I will try to find one...

Here is the matrix (see page four and five):

http://www.mpeixservers.hp.com/info_library/ds/88600100.pdf

A problem well defined is half solved.