- Community Home
- >
- Storage
- >
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- >
- HPE 3PAR StoreServ Storage
- >
- Re: Putting VV's in replication without initial re...
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-04-2018 07:16 AM
09-04-2018 07:16 AM
Putting VV's in replication without initial replication of the data
Hi,
Is it possible to put VV's in a sync-relation without initial replication of the data between them. Just putting primary and secondary in a sync relation.
I used to do this on a IBM DS8K systems.
I created a primary and secondary LUN (3PAR = LUN = VV) seperatly and then did put them in a sync relation with "no copy" param. Result was a LUN replcated to the other site without replication of the data.
Now I see my collegues creating VV's , putting them in a remotecopygroup and this LUN's start replicating every bit from the primary to the secondary site. This (over) loads the replication links without any reasons I would say.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-04-2018 05:40 PM
09-04-2018 05:40 PM
Re: Putting VV's in replication without initial replication of the data
The data is always replicated from the primary to the secondary.
That being said, if you have a new (read: empty) thin volume on the primary, you can either have a similar empty thin volume on the secondary system, or simply tell the secondary system what CPGs to use and it will create a new thin volume on the secondary side.
Whatever is in the primary will be replicated, however you will notice there is Very Little Storage allocated to a new (primary) volume.
Then as stuff ("technical term") is written to the primary, that's replicated as expected.
Note: While I am an HPE Employee, all of my comments (whether noted or not), are my own and are not any official representation of the company
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-06-2018 12:49 AM
09-06-2018 12:49 AM
Re: Putting VV's in replication without initial replication of the data
Hi Sheldon,
Correct answer , I can confirm !
I've seen 7 sec to put new, empty VV's in sync. But his was because not other VV's were in the also new created remote copy group .....
When we add new LUN's/VV's to an existing RCG, due to our procedures (3PAR restrictions ?) , one must stop the RCG first .
In that way we supend all other LUN's/VV's in the RCG . After starting the RCG, it took almost 12 minutes to re-sync (action taken during daylights, offive hours).
This re-sync is putting a lot of load on our replication links .
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-06-2018 02:43 PM - last edited on 06-29-2021 04:52 AM by Ramya_Heera
09-06-2018 02:43 PM - last edited on 06-29-2021 04:52 AM by Ramya_Heera
Re: Putting VV's in replication without initial replication of the data
I'm a little surprised.
- stoprcopygroup ...
- admitrcopyvv -createvv ...
- startrcopygroup ...
At any customers I've worked with in the past, this doesn't take much longer to run than it does to type this reply, either using command line or SSMC. A little puzzled that this would take "...almost 12 minutes to re-sync".
Have you contacted HPE 3PAR Support?
How many volumes are in the RCG, and what sort of bandwidth do you have between the remote copy targets? Perhaps the RCG could be split into multiple smaller groups?
Note: While I am an HPE Employee, all of my comments (whether noted or not), are my own and are not any official representation of the company