- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Legacy
- >
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- >
- Re: Servers Failover?
HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
1752740
Members
5892
Online
108789
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-04-2004 09:06 PM
04-04-2004 09:06 PM
Servers Failover?
Dear all
As shown in the figure i have two HP rp8400 servers. each one is partioned into two partion (hardware partion) . we have three databases.
1. Database2 clustered between two partion from THE TWO servers by using RAC.
2. Database1 is on server1.
3. Database3 is on server2.
each database has production and test enviroment.
each server has 8 CPU and 4 HDD (36GB) , 2 HDD for each partion and the OS installed and mirrored between the two HDD in each partion.
The servers is connected to SAN through Fiber switches.
My questions as show in the figure is it possible to have this solution inorder to achieve the following? :
1. Database high avalaibilty takeing into considration that the databases will be stored into SAN array
2. In case Database1 partion0 or server1 is down or any failure is it possible that server2 or partion1(DB3) will take over by using failover policy inorder to handle DB1?
3. In case Database3 partion1 or server2 is down or any failure is it possible that DB1 will handle DB3 by using failover policy?
4. Can i use the RAC for the rest of Databases DB1 and DB3 ?
5. Can i acheive the NSPF(NO SINGLE POINT OF FAILIURE) as show in the same figure?
And if you have any suggestions
I appreciate it.
Thank you
As shown in the figure i have two HP rp8400 servers. each one is partioned into two partion (hardware partion) . we have three databases.
1. Database2 clustered between two partion from THE TWO servers by using RAC.
2. Database1 is on server1.
3. Database3 is on server2.
each database has production and test enviroment.
each server has 8 CPU and 4 HDD (36GB) , 2 HDD for each partion and the OS installed and mirrored between the two HDD in each partion.
The servers is connected to SAN through Fiber switches.
My questions as show in the figure is it possible to have this solution inorder to achieve the following? :
1. Database high avalaibilty takeing into considration that the databases will be stored into SAN array
2. In case Database1 partion0 or server1 is down or any failure is it possible that server2 or partion1(DB3) will take over by using failover policy inorder to handle DB1?
3. In case Database3 partion1 or server2 is down or any failure is it possible that DB1 will handle DB3 by using failover policy?
4. Can i use the RAC for the rest of Databases DB1 and DB3 ?
5. Can i acheive the NSPF(NO SINGLE POINT OF FAILIURE) as show in the same figure?
And if you have any suggestions
I appreciate it.
Thank you
1 REPLY 1
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-05-2004 03:52 PM
04-05-2004 03:52 PM
Re: Servers Failover?
Hi,
1. Database can be stored into SAN array.
2. Yes absolutely possible. DB1 running on partition 0 Server1 can be failovered to parttition 1 on server2.
3.Yes. DB3 running on partition 1 Server2 can be failovered to partition 0 Server 1.
4. Yes u can RAC with rest of databases.
5. There needs to be alternate paths for all the Hard partitions and storage Devices which is not there in your diagram.
HTH
1. Database can be stored into SAN array.
2. Yes absolutely possible. DB1 running on partition 0 Server1 can be failovered to parttition 1 on server2.
3.Yes. DB3 running on partition 1 Server2 can be failovered to partition 0 Server 1.
4. Yes u can RAC with rest of databases.
5. There needs to be alternate paths for all the Hard partitions and storage Devices which is not there in your diagram.
HTH
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2024 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP