- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Legacy
- >
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- >
- Re: request benchmark info for PA8900 vs PA8800 on...
HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
1753717
Members
4499
Online
108799
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
юдл
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
юдл
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Go to solution
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО11-07-2005 02:44 AM
тАО11-07-2005 02:44 AM
Does anybody have performance information comparing an rp4440 running PA8900 cpus versus PA8800 cpus?
We are considering getting 2 rp4440 as sybase database servers. I know the PA8900 is faster. But it would be nice to see some actual performance data on it.
We are considering getting 2 rp4440 as sybase database servers. I know the PA8900 is faster. But it would be nice to see some actual performance data on it.
Solved! Go to Solution.
3 REPLIES 3
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО11-07-2005 05:33 AM
тАО11-07-2005 05:33 AM
Re: request benchmark info for PA8900 vs PA8800 on rp4440
The following white paper mention significant advantages of PA8900 processor
in terms of power , scalability and compares with PA8800 processor.
http://h71028.www7.hp.com/ERC/downloads/5982-4172EN.pdf
I am not sure if the benchmarking for Sybase on PA8800 and PA8900 is done. I would contact HP and confirm.
in terms of power , scalability and compares with PA8800 processor.
http://h71028.www7.hp.com/ERC/downloads/5982-4172EN.pdf
I am not sure if the benchmarking for Sybase on PA8800 and PA8900 is done. I would contact HP and confirm.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО11-07-2005 08:30 AM
тАО11-07-2005 08:30 AM
Re: request benchmark info for PA8900 vs PA8800 on rp4440
Steve,
The important thing to point out here is that the PA8900 is FASTER than the PA8800 and CHEAPER as well!
Not really a lot of point in buying a PA8800 now (unless you're in the market for 2nd user equipment)
Incidentally unless you absolutely have to squeeze every last drop of performance out of the box, go for 1.0GHz rather than 1.1GHz as they're nearly as performant, but quite a bit less expensive.
HTH
Duncan
I am an HPE Employee
The important thing to point out here is that the PA8900 is FASTER than the PA8800 and CHEAPER as well!
Not really a lot of point in buying a PA8800 now (unless you're in the market for 2nd user equipment)
Incidentally unless you absolutely have to squeeze every last drop of performance out of the box, go for 1.0GHz rather than 1.1GHz as they're nearly as performant, but quite a bit less expensive.
HTH
Duncan
I am an HPE Employee
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО11-07-2005 03:16 PM
тАО11-07-2005 03:16 PM
Solution
On the rp4440, the clock rates options are the same for the pa8900 as the pa8800, 1GHz and 800MHz, so the only difference for it is the 64MB L2 cache for the pa8900 versus the 32MB L2 cache of the pa8800. Since this is the only significant refinement, I would not expect to see much of an performance increase. Memory is the same, I/O is the same and the clock rate is the same, so unless you are really lucky and have an application that gets a big boost from the larger cache the improvement will be minimal. Benchmark performance improvement would be very dependent on the specific benchmark. You could always write one to make the improvement look large or small, but I think real applications will see a very minor improvement. If you are looking for real performance improvements per core, consider Itanium if you have recompiled code for it. Unfortunately, you will have to wait for Montecito to get 8 Itanium cores in that entry level system, or go the the rx7620.
Mom 6
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2024 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP