- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- HPE BladeSystem
- >
- BladeSystem - General
- >
- 554FLB errors post SPP 2014.09.0 firmware update q...
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-02-2014 06:58 AM
12-02-2014 06:58 AM
554FLB errors post SPP 2014.09.0 firmware update question
A customer question from Hoa:
************
I have a customer with 460 Gen8 configured w/ 554FLB and 554M using both Redhat & Oracle UKE in VC FF 10/24 in two enclosures MES BfS configuration. Post VC 4.31 and SPP 2014.09.0 +MSB update, they have 17 servers shown up with below errors upon Linux BfS, before firmware update they had two systems behaving this way. Customer strongly disagree with VC support team’s analysis (uploaded VC support-dump) that this is a Linux issue, not 554FLB OR VC issues. Has anyone come across this issue before?
**************
Reply from Kevin:
**********
Hello Hoa,
It appears that you have the linux bond set for “mode 4” aka 802.3ad which is not supported. Please provide evidence of the bonded script in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts.
************
From Hoa:
***********
Hi Kevin,
So what mode Linux bonding VC supports? That we can recommend.
**********
From Kevin:
************
Hello Hoa,
Mode 1
active_slave
Specifies the new active slave for modes that support it
(active-backup, balance-alb and balance-tlb). Possible values
are the name of any currently enslaved interface, or an empty
string. If a name is given, the slave and its link must be up in order
to be selected as the new active slave. If an empty string is
specified, the current active slave is cleared, and a new active
slave is selected automatically.
Note that this is only available through the sysfs interface. No module
parameter by this name exists.
The normal value of this option is the name of the currently
active slave, or the empty string if there is no active slave or
the current mode does not use an active slave.
Mode 5
balance-tlb or 5
Adaptive transmit load balancing: channel bonding that
does not require any special switch support.
In tlb_dynamic_lb=1 mode; the outgoing traffic is
distributed according to the current load (computed
relative to the speed) on each slave.
In tlb_dynamic_lb=0 mode; the load balancing based on
current load is disabled and the load is distributed
only using the hash distribution.
Incoming traffic is received by the current slave.
If the receiving slave fails, another slave takes over
the MAC address of the failed receiving slave.
Prerequisite:
Ethtool support in the base drivers for retrieving the
speed of each slave.
Mode 6
balance-alb or 6
Adaptive load balancing: includes balance-tlb plus
receive load balancing (rlb) for IPV4 traffic, and
does not require any special switch support. The
receive load balancing is achieved by ARP negotiation.
The bonding driver intercepts the ARP Replies sent by
the local system on their way out and overwrites the
source hardware address with the unique hardware
address of one of the slaves in the bond such that
different peers use different hardware addresses for
the server.
Receive traffic from connections created by the server
is also balanced. When the local system sends an ARP
Request the bonding driver copies and saves the peer's
IP information from the ARP packet. When the ARP
Reply arrives from the peer, its hardware address is
retrieved and the bonding driver initiates an ARP
reply to this peer assigning it to one of the slaves
in the bond. A problematic outcome of using ARP
negotiation for balancing is that each time that an
ARP request is broadcast it uses the hardware address
of the bond. Hence, peers learn the hardware address
of the bond and the balancing of receive traffic
collapses to the current slave. This is handled by
sending updates (ARP Replies) to all the peers with
their individually assigned hardware address such that
the traffic is redistributed. Receive traffic is also
redistributed when a new slave is added to the bond
and when an inactive slave is re-activated. The
receive load is distributed sequentially (round robin)
among the group of highest speed slaves in the bond.
When a link is reconnected or a new slave joins the
bond the receive traffic is redistributed among all
active slaves in the bond by initiating ARP Replies
with the selected MAC address to each of the
clients. The updelay parameter (detailed below) must
be set to a value equal or greater than the switch's
forwarding delay so that the ARP Replies sent to the
peers will not be blocked by the switch.
Prerequisites:
1. Ethtool support in the base drivers for retrieving
the speed of each slave.
2. Base driver support for setting the hardware
address of a device while it is open. This is
required so that there will always be one slave in the
team using the bond hardware address (the
curr_active_slave) while having a unique hardware
address for each slave in the bond. If the
curr_active_slave fails its hardware address is
swapped with the new curr_active_slave that was
*********
From Hoa:
**********
Do you think this doc should mention VC can’t support Linux bonding mode 4?
***********
And from Kevin:
************
Yes there is a saw article indicating that mode 4 is not supported.
************
Comments?