- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- HPE BladeSystem
- >
- BladeSystem - General
- >
- Re: Battery-backed write cache option being remove...
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-03-2011 08:08 AM
02-03-2011 08:08 AM
Battery-backed write cache option being removed from BL460c G7 blade
Some latest info for you regarding issues we have seen with the BL460c G7 servers and the Battery-Backed Write Cache module. We are recommending customers use the Flash-Backed Write Cache module for this server.
*************************
From Dan, who is the BL460c Product Manager.
The 512MB BBWC option for the embedded RAID controller will no longer be offered on the BL460c G7. The stand-alone battery option for the 256MB write cache module also won’t be offered. The preferred solution is to use the 512MB or 1GB FBWC (flash-backed write cache) options.
Customers who already have the BBWC option installed are fine and still supported. We’d like people to use the more advanced flash-backed cache for new systems, though.
These are the part numbers that won’t be configurable on the BL460c G7 anymore:
* HP 650 mAh P-Series Battery 462969-B21
* HP 512MB P-Series Battery Backed Write Cache Upgrade 462967-B21
Here’s what HP recommends you use instead:
* HP 512MB Flash Backed Write Cache 534916-B21
* HP 1GB Flash Backed Cache 534562-B21
For more info on flash-backed write caches, see the Flash Backed Write Cache topic (starting page 20) in the Smart Array Controller technology whitepaper:
http://h20000.www2.hp.com/bc/docs/support/SupportManual/c00687518/c00687518.pdf
**************************
Comments, questions, or suggestions?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-22-2012 12:38 PM
08-22-2012 12:38 PM
Re: Battery-backed write cache option being removed from BL460c G7 blade
I work in classified computing, and under government regulations all removable writable media must be accounted for. This poses some problems when it comes to flash-backed write cache.
The modules are, as far as our regulators are concerned, no different from a disk drive, and therefore must be labelled with the classification information and contract number, tracked by serial number and inventoried periodically, and must be removed and destroyed when the system reaches the end of its life since there's no bulletproof way to fully sanitize flash-based media.
If HP is moving away from battery-only write caches, which can be sanitized by removing the power for 60 seconds, then it's going to create a new assortment of paperwork and headaches for those of us in the classified computing universe..