- Community Home
- >
- Storage
- >
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- >
- HPE EVA Storage
- >
- Re: EVA4400 performance issue
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО10-26-2010 10:34 AM
тАО10-26-2010 10:34 AM
EVA4400 performance issue
sqlio -kW -t3 -s60 -b4
sqlio v1.5.SG
3 threads writing for 60 secs to file testfile.dat using 4KB IOs over 256KB stripes with 64 IOs per run initialization done
CUMULATIVE DATA:
throughput metrics:
IOs/sec: 9488.56
MBs/sec: 37.06
Then I create a disk 350Gb, RAID1 on and present it to the same host, speed is twice different!
D:\SQLIO>sqlio -kW -t3 -s60 -b4
sqlio v1.5.SG
3 threads writing for 60 secs to file testfile.dat using 4KB IOs over 256KB stripes with 64 IOs per run initialization done
CUMULATIVE DATA:
throughput metrics:
IOs/sec: 4675.58
MBs/sec: 18.26
Why its happens? VDisk from same storage in the same Disk Group has different performance?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО10-26-2010 12:30 PM
тАО10-26-2010 12:30 PM
Re: EVA4400 performance issue
really stange, as you use the same disk/raid it shoudnt be different.
Try other parameters/ benchmarks?
Jan
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО10-26-2010 01:12 PM
тАО10-26-2010 01:12 PM
Re: EVA4400 performance issue
Why do a IOtest which adds software striping, to a EVA diskarray that allready, afaik, does hardware striping of all IO by default ? (and software striping over hardware striping normally worsens the performance) Remove the software striping parameter and see what the results are then.
Greetz,
Chris
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО10-26-2010 09:39 PM
тАО10-26-2010 09:39 PM
Re: EVA4400 performance issue
Yes for example test it 64k size (sqlio -kW -t3 -s60 -b64)
And test results are same on LUNs
100Gb Raid1 VDISK
L:\SQLIO>sqlio -kW -t3 -s60 -b64
sqlio v1.5.SG
3 threads writing for 60 secs to file testfile.dat using 64KB IOs over 4096KB stripes with 64 IOs
initialization done
CUMULATIVE DATA:
throughput metrics:
IOs/sec: 3540.73
MBs/sec: 221.29
350Gb Raid1 VDISK
D:\SQLIO>sqlio -kW -t3 -s60 -b64
sqlio v1.5.SG
3 threads writing for 60 secs to file testfile.dat using 64KB IOs over 4096KB stripes with 64 IOs
initialization done
CUMULATIVE DATA:
throughput metrics:
IOs/sec: 3744.12
MBs/sec: 234.00
But why is so different wane I use 4k size? May be its depends on vdisk size?
Chris Huys,
Remove the software striping parameter? Where or how? I'm not using any stripe
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО10-26-2010 10:24 PM
тАО10-26-2010 10:24 PM
Re: EVA4400 performance issue
I do not know sqlio software, so I can not help with stripping options.
Regarding block size - different block size results in very different results. Smallar block usually produce small r/w perf - as they require more IOs. Each drive is cabable only of limited amounth of IO - in case of 15K FC drives let say 170 IOps per drive. If you use bigger block - you need less IO and get better w/r performance.
But remember - this works only in case of large block used by application - which is usually not true (maybe in video editing it is ok). So you have to try block size used in your app, or tune the application how it works with different block size.
If I am not wrong, EVA's use 128K block natively.
Jan
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО10-26-2010 11:08 PM
тАО10-26-2010 11:08 PM
Re: EVA4400 performance issue
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/en/details.aspx?familyid=9A8B005B-84E4-4F24-8D65-CB53442D9E19&displaylang=en
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО10-27-2010 02:56 PM
тАО10-27-2010 02:56 PM
Re: EVA4400 performance issue
> D:\SQLIO>sqlio -kW -t3 -s60 -b4
> sqlio v1.5.SG
> 3 threads writing for 60 secs to file
> testfile.dat using 4KB IOs "over 256KB
> stripes" with 64 IOs per run initialization
> done
The "over 256KB stripes" suggest the sqlio tool is emulating striping with the "given sqlio command options"..
While f.e. from the following url :
http://communities.vmware.com/thread/90464
, the following sqlio command doesnt do "striping"..
C:\Program Files\SQLIO>"C:\Program Files\SQLIO\sqlio.exe" -frandom -i1
sqlio v1.5.SG
1 thread reading for 30 secs from file testfile.dat
using 2KB random IOs
using current size: 8 MB for file: testfile.dat
initialization done
Also I suppose, that the eva4400 should be giving results, comparable, with the following sites results for a eva6100..
http://blogs.mssqltips.com/blogs/chadboyd/archive/2008/03/16/ssd-and-sql-sqlio-performance.aspx
Greetz,
Chris
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО10-28-2010 03:30 AM
тАО10-28-2010 03:30 AM
Re: EVA4400 performance issue
Jan
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО10-29-2010 07:13 AM
тАО10-29-2010 07:13 AM