- Community Home
- >
- Storage
- >
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- >
- HPE EVA Storage
- >
- Re: Expected performance of EVA4400 FATA drives
HPE EVA Storage
1753693
Members
6212
Online
108799
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
юдл
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
юдл
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-29-2010 02:20 PM
тАО01-29-2010 02:20 PM
Expected performance of EVA4400 FATA drives
We are currently standing up a EVA4400 with 24 1TB FATA drives, as a single group, then split into a four LUNs.
What would you guys(or gals) think we should expect in sequential write performance?
BTW the hosts have 4 8Gb fibre links to the SAN, so the bottle neck will be either the EVA controllers or most likely the FATA disks.
What would you guys(or gals) think we should expect in sequential write performance?
BTW the hosts have 4 8Gb fibre links to the SAN, so the bottle neck will be either the EVA controllers or most likely the FATA disks.
2 REPLIES 2
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-29-2010 07:10 PM
тАО01-29-2010 07:10 PM
Re: Expected performance of EVA4400 FATA drives
Hi Murray,
1TB can max write 68 IO/Sec. For 24 drives , you would expect to get approx 800 IOPS for Raid1, 400 for Raid5 and 250 for Raid6
Regards
Susanta
1TB can max write 68 IO/Sec. For 24 drives , you would expect to get approx 800 IOPS for Raid1, 400 for Raid5 and 250 for Raid6
Regards
Susanta
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-30-2010 03:14 AM
тАО01-30-2010 03:14 AM
Re: Expected performance of EVA4400 FATA drives
That's on the worst case of 100% random writes.
On sequential write you can get 120 MB/s in RAID 1 and 192 MB/s on RAID 5 and 6.
On sequential write you can get 120 MB/s in RAID 1 and 192 MB/s on RAID 5 and 6.
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2024 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP