- Community Home
- >
- Storage
- >
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- >
- HPE EVA Storage
- >
- MSA 2012i and XenServer
HPE EVA Storage
1753366
Members
5284
Online
108792
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-20-2010 12:33 PM
04-20-2010 12:33 PM
MSA 2012i and XenServer
Hi,
I recently purchased a MSA 2012 SAN for our infrstructure, and this has 5TB of storage. This serves two ESX 4 hosts. All is working perfectly and am really happy with the product.
We are now looking to implement a citrix xenapp and xendesktop product for a VDI project.
We have asked a citrix gold partner to help with the project. They have suggested that the HP san would need to be replaced with a compellent solution because the HP just won't be able to cope with the Data Ins and Outs IOPS that running this kind of environment requires. On a single SAN volume, there can be many virtual machines. For a server deployments, 10-20 VM's like you have now and for VDI deployments it could be up to 50-70 VMs. So the on-going problem has been how do you ensure each of these VMs has the performance it needs when some VMs are very active and others are not? That’s a valid question for less capable storage systems for most vendors. But a better question is, “How can I provide tier 1 storage storage performance to only the blocks that need it?” Only Compellent can provide a simple answer to that question with their automated tiered storage.
With the HP you just have 1 tier of performance. With the Compellent you have three (two physical tiers of disk types and the fastrack capability of ensuring high performance data is on the fastest spinning part of the disk). In a VDI environment where you have multiple window servers doing various things one size fits all doesn't work. For instance why have a barely used domain controller sitting on the same tier (and taking the same resource) as a constantly used desktop provisioning server?
Is this a valid point or are we being led down the compellent route for no reason?
Thanks
I recently purchased a MSA 2012 SAN for our infrstructure, and this has 5TB of storage. This serves two ESX 4 hosts. All is working perfectly and am really happy with the product.
We are now looking to implement a citrix xenapp and xendesktop product for a VDI project.
We have asked a citrix gold partner to help with the project. They have suggested that the HP san would need to be replaced with a compellent solution because the HP just won't be able to cope with the Data Ins and Outs IOPS that running this kind of environment requires. On a single SAN volume, there can be many virtual machines. For a server deployments, 10-20 VM's like you have now and for VDI deployments it could be up to 50-70 VMs. So the on-going problem has been how do you ensure each of these VMs has the performance it needs when some VMs are very active and others are not? That’s a valid question for less capable storage systems for most vendors. But a better question is, “How can I provide tier 1 storage storage performance to only the blocks that need it?” Only Compellent can provide a simple answer to that question with their automated tiered storage.
With the HP you just have 1 tier of performance. With the Compellent you have three (two physical tiers of disk types and the fastrack capability of ensuring high performance data is on the fastest spinning part of the disk). In a VDI environment where you have multiple window servers doing various things one size fits all doesn't work. For instance why have a barely used domain controller sitting on the same tier (and taking the same resource) as a constantly used desktop provisioning server?
Is this a valid point or are we being led down the compellent route for no reason?
Thanks
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2024 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP