- Community Home
- >
- Storage
- >
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- >
- HPE EVA Storage
- >
- MSA2312fc Hardware RAID slower than Win 2008 Softw...
HPE EVA Storage
1753380
Members
5805
Online
108792
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-23-2009 08:36 PM
11-23-2009 08:36 PM
MSA2312fc Hardware RAID slower than Win 2008 Software RAID
Hi All,
I am using Windows 2008 64-bit. It appears that the Windows software RAID is much faster than the hardware RAID provided by the HP MSA 2312FC. I tried RAID-0 and RAID-5 and the software RAID is still better than MSA hardware RAID.
I am comparing:
Disk_A: is a 5 drives hardware RAID-0
Disk_B: is 5 drives software RAID. The drives are in the MSA enclosures but they are RAIDed through the Windows software RAID.
Disk_B is coming up faster than Disk_A. Around 15%-20 faster from random reads using 4096 bytes-blocks and the MSA performance gets worse as I inrease the block sizes! I would have expected Disk_B (software) to be slower or is that a known problem with the MSA?
My HBA driver had a maximum queue depth of "16" per LUN. I raised it to "80" and the performance increased but still the software is outperforming the MSA hardware RAID.
To also rule out RAID-0 being the problem. I tried RAID-5 and the results are still disappointing.
The table below shows the I/O counts from IOMeter using an 8GB file reading 4KB with 20,40, and 60 outstanding requests. As you can see both arrays are almost the same and surprisingly the Software (SW) RAID is 10% faster!! When I change the mix to be 30% write and 70% read, both arrays are identical in performance. I would have expected the MSA RAID would be faster but seems it is consistently slower than SW RAID
__________________20_________40___________60
SW-RAID5__________937________1074_________1135
HW-RAID5__________849________949__________993
Would anyone have any thoughts on what is happening or suggestion on what I can try out?
Thanks,
Ahmed
I am using Windows 2008 64-bit. It appears that the Windows software RAID is much faster than the hardware RAID provided by the HP MSA 2312FC. I tried RAID-0 and RAID-5 and the software RAID is still better than MSA hardware RAID.
I am comparing:
Disk_A: is a 5 drives hardware RAID-0
Disk_B: is 5 drives software RAID. The drives are in the MSA enclosures but they are RAIDed through the Windows software RAID.
Disk_B is coming up faster than Disk_A. Around 15%-20 faster from random reads using 4096 bytes-blocks and the MSA performance gets worse as I inrease the block sizes! I would have expected Disk_B (software) to be slower or is that a known problem with the MSA?
My HBA driver had a maximum queue depth of "16" per LUN. I raised it to "80" and the performance increased but still the software is outperforming the MSA hardware RAID.
To also rule out RAID-0 being the problem. I tried RAID-5 and the results are still disappointing.
The table below shows the I/O counts from IOMeter using an 8GB file reading 4KB with 20,40, and 60 outstanding requests. As you can see both arrays are almost the same and surprisingly the Software (SW) RAID is 10% faster!! When I change the mix to be 30% write and 70% read, both arrays are identical in performance. I would have expected the MSA RAID would be faster but seems it is consistently slower than SW RAID
__________________20_________40___________60
SW-RAID5__________937________1074_________1135
HW-RAID5__________849________949__________993
Would anyone have any thoughts on what is happening or suggestion on what I can try out?
Thanks,
Ahmed
1 REPLY 1
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-24-2009 03:34 AM
11-24-2009 03:34 AM
Re: MSA2312fc Hardware RAID slower than Win 2008 Software RAID
Hi Ahmed,
I agree with your problem, I have exactly the same with a MSA2324FC. I did a lot of tests and I find out that its a problem with larger files. Did you try to copy a large file (> 3GB) to the MSA? Maybe you can tell me what happend than.
I also open a tread with that problem but still have no answer.
Best regards,
Markus
I agree with your problem, I have exactly the same with a MSA2324FC. I did a lot of tests and I find out that its a problem with larger files. Did you try to copy a large file (> 3GB) to the MSA? Maybe you can tell me what happend than.
I also open a tread with that problem but still have no answer.
Best regards,
Markus
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2024 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP