- Community Home
- >
- Storage
- >
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- >
- HPE EVA Storage
- >
- Re: Need your expertise on SAN Drives performance/...
HPE EVA Storage
1752801
Members
5835
Online
108789
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
юдл
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
юдл
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Go to solution
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-27-2009 06:48 AM
тАО03-27-2009 06:48 AM
Hi folks, this is my first post on HP SAN forum. We have an EVA4000 running at 2gbps fibre channel.
I used HD Tach to benchmark the two Vdisks listed below which were presented to a physical machine with the following config:
HP DL360
1x dual core Xeon 3.4GHz
4gb RAM
Windows 2003 Server
My concern is with the average read and burst speeds weтАЩre seeing. They seem awfully slow as I get better on my local desktop!
Are these results normal? Could someone help me to verify?
I was expecting way better performance from my SAN.
Test Configuration:
Vdisk 1
260gb RAID 5
Disk group: 16x 500gb FATA 7200 rpm drives
Vdisk 2
300gb RAID 5
Disk group: 32x 146gb FC 10k rpm drives
After running the tests multiple times, the results of the two tests were very similar.
Vdisk 1
Random access: 14ms
Average read: 40 MB/s
Burst Speed: 107.4MB/s
Vdisk 2
Random access: 7.6ms
Average read: 41.7MB/s
Burst Speed: 107.8 MB/s
Many thanks.
I used HD Tach to benchmark the two Vdisks listed below which were presented to a physical machine with the following config:
HP DL360
1x dual core Xeon 3.4GHz
4gb RAM
Windows 2003 Server
My concern is with the average read and burst speeds weтАЩre seeing. They seem awfully slow as I get better on my local desktop!
Are these results normal? Could someone help me to verify?
I was expecting way better performance from my SAN.
Test Configuration:
Vdisk 1
260gb RAID 5
Disk group: 16x 500gb FATA 7200 rpm drives
Vdisk 2
300gb RAID 5
Disk group: 32x 146gb FC 10k rpm drives
After running the tests multiple times, the results of the two tests were very similar.
Vdisk 1
Random access: 14ms
Average read: 40 MB/s
Burst Speed: 107.4MB/s
Vdisk 2
Random access: 7.6ms
Average read: 41.7MB/s
Burst Speed: 107.8 MB/s
Many thanks.
Solved! Go to Solution.
2 REPLIES 2
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-27-2009 06:56 AM
тАО03-27-2009 06:56 AM
Re: Need your expertise on SAN Drives performance/speed
Many storage arrays are designed for performing better at many I/O operations per second, not MegaByte per second. I don't know the I/O pattern of this "HD tach", but I can easily show very different MB/s throughput just by changing the block size between 32 KBytes and 512 Bytes. Or change, if possible, the number of outstanding I/Os on your test program.
I've been at a customer who was running an old "DOS-style" application (Navision 'classic' running under cmd.exe). He wanted to compare his new EVA with the old system and ran a predefined task to alter some data. Well, the performance was not better - because it is a single-threaded task. I asked him to run some more tasks and we could see that the EVA's I/O throughput was growing with each additional task.
I've been at a customer who was running an old "DOS-style" application (Navision 'classic' running under cmd.exe). He wanted to compare his new EVA with the old system and ran a predefined task to alter some data. Well, the performance was not better - because it is a single-threaded task. I asked him to run some more tasks and we could see that the EVA's I/O throughput was growing with each additional task.
.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-27-2009 07:34 AM
тАО03-27-2009 07:34 AM
Solution
It depends a lot on how the softare does the test.
I see very strange that you get 40 MB/s from both disk groups, since one has 16 disks and another 32. Also, 500 GB FATA disks are the slower ones, slower than al other FATA, don't expect too much from them.
You could be limited by the HBA queue depth or some parameter in Windows. Also, if you have more than one HBA try enabling load balancing in MPIO.
Check these articles:
http://h20000.www2.hp.com/bizsupport/TechSupport/Document.jsp?objectID=c01685240
http://h20000.www2.hp.com/bizsupport/TechSupport/Document.jsp?objectID=c01671044
I see very strange that you get 40 MB/s from both disk groups, since one has 16 disks and another 32. Also, 500 GB FATA disks are the slower ones, slower than al other FATA, don't expect too much from them.
You could be limited by the HBA queue depth or some parameter in Windows. Also, if you have more than one HBA try enabling load balancing in MPIO.
Check these articles:
http://h20000.www2.hp.com/bizsupport/TechSupport/Document.jsp?objectID=c01685240
http://h20000.www2.hp.com/bizsupport/TechSupport/Document.jsp?objectID=c01671044
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2024 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP