- Community Home
- >
- Storage
- >
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- >
- HPE EVA Storage
- >
- P2000 with ESX 4.1 volume
HPE EVA Storage
1752795
Members
6933
Online
108789
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-09-2010 08:45 AM
12-09-2010 08:45 AM
P2000 with ESX 4.1 volume
Hi,
I'm currently setting a 4.1 infra with a P2000 24TB 10GBE iscsi unit.
After reading the best practises for the P2000 i'm kinda stuck.
HP is stating:
"In order to get the maximum sequential performance from a vdisk, you should only create one volume per vdisk. Otherwise you will introduce randomness into the workload when multiple volumes on the vdisk are being exercised"
My minimum LUN is in all cases 2TB (4x500GB disk) raid 5 set. About 1.5TB netto.
That brings me in a situation that it saying that it's best practise to create only 1 volume (vmfs) per vdisk. that means a VMFS volume of 1.5TB
Now i always used the x round((maxVMs * avgSize) + 20% (10 a 15 VM's per VMFS volume) and never used volumes bigger that 750GB. Assuming that is VMware best practise. HP is saying only use one volume per vdisk that brings me @ 1.5TB per VMFS volume.
Now is there any reason to NOT use a 1.5 VMFS volumes with alot of sequentiele data? Is the "500GB till 750GB" still modern in the current storage world?
Thanks!
I'm currently setting a 4.1 infra with a P2000 24TB 10GBE iscsi unit.
After reading the best practises for the P2000 i'm kinda stuck.
HP is stating:
"In order to get the maximum sequential performance from a vdisk, you should only create one volume per vdisk. Otherwise you will introduce randomness into the workload when multiple volumes on the vdisk are being exercised"
My minimum LUN is in all cases 2TB (4x500GB disk) raid 5 set. About 1.5TB netto.
That brings me in a situation that it saying that it's best practise to create only 1 volume (vmfs) per vdisk. that means a VMFS volume of 1.5TB
Now i always used the x round((maxVMs * avgSize) + 20% (10 a 15 VM's per VMFS volume) and never used volumes bigger that 750GB. Assuming that is VMware best practise. HP is saying only use one volume per vdisk that brings me @ 1.5TB per VMFS volume.
Now is there any reason to NOT use a 1.5 VMFS volumes with alot of sequentiele data? Is the "500GB till 750GB" still modern in the current storage world?
Thanks!
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2024 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP