- Community Home
- >
- Storage
- >
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- >
- HPE EVA Storage
- >
- Upgrading an MSA 2000 G1 to P2000 G3
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-30-2011 02:32 PM
06-30-2011 02:32 PM
Upgrading an MSA 2000 G1 to P2000 G3
Per:
http://h20195.www2.hp.com/v2/GetPDF.aspx/4AA0-8284ENW.pdf
it says:
When using heterogeneous expansion enclosures (6G and 3G)
the MSA2000 (3G) expansion enclosures must be installed as the
last enclosures and straight-through cabling must be deployed.
Can you elaborate on "must"? I would like to upgrade my existing
MSA2000 G1, 4 enclosure setup. I am installing two new P2000 G3
FC/iSCSI controllers in my existing MSA2000 G1 SAS 3G enclosure,
as supported. I have to do this to upgrade the array and
preserve data. I am adding 4 new P2000 6G enclosures. The
devices will be installed top down like this:
1: P2000 G3 array head in MSA2000 Enclosure
2: P2000 6G enclosure
3: P2000 6G enclosure
4: P2000 6G enclosure
5: P2000 6G enclosure
6: MSA2000 3G enclosure
7: MSA2000 3G enclosure
8: MSA2000 3G enclorure
I do not want to use straight through cabling, I want to use
fault tolerant. I understand that the B end of the array ahead
will hit the 3G device first, while the A end will hit the 6G
device first. I am willing to live with this. My question is on
HP's use of the word "must" in the above quote sentence from the
guide. Is there a reason other than slower performance why I
can't use fault tolerant cabling here? Is there a critical
reason? I have another functioning system using fault tolerant
cabling in the same config without issue. If it is just " the B end will run at 3G" then I am fine with that. I can make my existing 3G vdisks owned by B, and new 6G vdisks owned by A. B can provide failover for A, at reduced speeds until is back up.